We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye lose
Options
Comments
-
Yes im willing to do that how would i go about this.
Isnt it perjury my parents saying they were driving when they werent.0 -
Hello Tony, can you post the above into a new thread please, this one is from 7 months ago - many thanks
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/forumdisplay.php?f=163Excel Parking, MET Parking, Combined Parking Solutions, VP Parking Solutions, ANPR PC Ltd, & Roxburghe Debt Collectors. What do they all have in common?
They are all or have been suspended from accessing the DVLA database for gross misconduct!
Do you really need to ask what kind of people run parking companies?0 -
Has you got a copy of a transcript or other details please. I'm collecting such verdicts to throw into the fray on appeals.Manchester County Court 1XJ81016
Parking Eye v Smith
Defendant parked on two occasions without paying and therefore owed damages for the contractual breach. This amounted to £15 (clearly listed on a sign as a list of tariffs).
Pannone sent FOUR solicitors and attempted to claim costs of... (wait for it)
£4457.20.
Original claim of £240 deemed a contractual penalty unrelated to damages incurred.
£15 + £95 costs awarded.
The lesson here is probably to pay for any damages sooner rather than later, which may have avoided the £95 costs.
Still, Parking Eye won't be looking forward to their big Pannone bill. Quite why you'd employ 4 solicitors for a small claims case and why Pannone thought they'd get £4k is probably the biggest mystery in all this.Confucius say woman who sits on Judges knee gets honourable discharge0 -
Alexis27 has not been on the forum for over 18 months! ....The word "gullible" isn't in the dictionaryTickets: 19 [cancelled: 18, paid: 0, pending: 1]
PPC Appeals: 8 [accepted: 2, rejected: 5, pending: 1]
POPLA: 4 [accepted: 4, rejected: 0, pending: 0]0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards