Online shop requiring scanned copies of IDs

esuhl

Flyboy152 wrote: »

But Very can prove the goods have been delivered.

According to the OP the goods have not been delivered, therefore it is logically impossible for anyone in the universe to have proof to the contrary. You are either calling the OP a liar or have misunderstood the definition of "proof".

If it is possible to prove things that are false, how would you go about proving that a square has sixteen sides when such a concept is logically contradictory?

Flyboy152

esuhl wrote: »

According to the OP the goods have not been delivered, therefore it is logically impossible for anyone in the universe to have proof to the contrary. You are either calling the OP a liar or have misunderstood the definition of "proof".

If it is possible to prove things that are false, how would you go about proving that a square has sixteen sides when such a concept is logically contradictory?

In which case, Very have the proof of delivery. If they don't, what do they have? If you do not believe a signature is proof of delivery, what proof do you think should be acceptable.