why in gods name has mse...

Fridge3

cit_k wrote: »

Personally, I think an ATOS rep on board is only going to help show up atos for what it really is.

Personally, I think having an ATOS rep on board providing clear, factual and objective answers can only be a good thing.

bobajob_1966

I can see the value of a company representative who presents accurate and helpful information that is not readily available otherwise (i.e. not just links to other websites). The E On/ Quidco etc representatives are also very helpful at looking into individual complaints. However, when people post about ATOS they are very vulnerable, and the thought of a representative actively monitoring the boards, where someone has come here for impartial support and advice, seems counter productive. I know it would put me off asking for help.

For the record, I don't think ATOS are all bad (though they are far from perfect), I just don't think this is a suitable place for their input.

Fridge3

cit_k wrote: »

So just to confirm, your stating ATOS sought out permission to post - ie contacted MSE and asked for permission to put a rep on the forum.

And its all been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt they are who they say they are (ie checked with ATOS that its not someone spoofing etc?)

Just need to make sure..

I interpreted as Andrea and the team reviewed company permission requests, had a discussion, made a decision and we now have an ATOS rep for the benefit of many users who raise questions.

Seems fair enough to me and I must say I can't see any reason to doubt the integrity of those making the decisions.

FTW

Fridge3 wrote: »

Personally, I think having an ATOS rep on board providing clear, factual and objective answers can only be a good thing.

And what makes you think that you'll get any of that from having an Atoss rep on board?

Fridge3

FTW wrote: »

And what makes you think that you'll get any of that from having an Atoss rep on board?

Read #54, it's quite easy to comprehend.

Hope there's no intent to malign with that spelling FT - Atos only has one 's'.

FTW

Fridge3 wrote: »

Read #54, it's quite easy to comprehend.

Hope there's no intent to malign with that spelling FT - Atos only has one 's'.

Atoss doesn't do 'clear, factual and objective' (but then, neither do you).

So what is there to comprehend?

Fridge3

FTW wrote: »

- so, what's yours?

Already outlined that one several times over.

FTW

Fridge3 wrote: »

Already outlined that one several times over.

No, you didn't.

System

Fridge3 wrote: »

Personally, I think having an ATOS rep on board providing clear, factual and objective answers can only be a good thing.

They should try doing that in their medicals :rotfl:

FTW

xXMessedUpXx wrote: »

They should try doing that in their medicals :rotfl:

Fat chance of that ever happening.