We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Ex-employer taking ages to provide a reference????

24567

Comments

  • Milkshock wrote: »
    hassle them for it, you arent wrong in continually asking because you have that letter.

    until they say 'no we will not do it'

    at which point you can take them to court.

    I doubt she will do that she is the sort that keeps hanging on and hanging on or is always busy.
  • I doubt she will do that she is the sort that keeps hanging on and hanging on or is always busy.

    if she refuses to give a reference, when she said she would, and you can prove you lost a job because of her refsual you can certainly claim damages.
  • Emmzi wrote: »
    You state the wording as we can provide, not we will provide, or are obliged to provide.

    For once, I am glad I got something wrong. The letter reads.

    If required, we will provide you with a basic reference.

    WILL not can
  • But as I said both companys told me they would be ok with a basic reference with dates, and dates don't take long to write.

    The letter says We WILL so surely that is legally binding?
  • Milkshock
    Milkshock Posts: 402 Forumite
    edited 25 September 2011 at 2:38PM
    But as I said both companys told me they would be ok with a basic reference with dates, and dates don't take long to write.

    The letter says We WILL so surely that is legally binding?

    yes of course it is. and a refusal to supply - and you should wait for a refusal/or loss of job due to no response in a request for a reference - can be challenged in the civil courts.

    keep a written record of every request you make to them

    e-mail them and keep the emails with the date.
  • Milkshock wrote: »
    yes of course it is. and a refusal to supply - and you should wait for a refusal - can be challenged in the civil courts.

    Thanks your advice is really helpful But to be completely honest I would rather not get a refusal and just get the bleedin' reference so I can earn money. I only earned £432 pcm (£500 good month) there I earn a little over £1,000 at my new job
  • Milkshock
    Milkshock Posts: 402 Forumite
    edited 25 September 2011 at 2:42PM
    Thanks your advice is really helpful But to be completely honest I would rather not get a refusal and just get the bleedin' reference so I can earn money. I only earned £432 pcm (£500 good month) there I earn a little over £1,000 at my new job

    tell your new job that you are struggling to get the ref., and ask them to please hold on while you sort it out.

    believe me at least your old job arent bad mouthing you to the new job, despite giving out a good reference, which is what happened to me!
  • SarEl
    SarEl Posts: 5,683 Forumite
    Milkshock wrote: »
    yes of course it is. and a refusal to supply - and you should wait for a refusal/or loss of job due to no response in a request for a reference - can be challenged in the civil courts.

    keep a written record of every request you make to them

    e-mail them and keep the emails with the date.

    And since this as much twaddle as everything else you have posted, it is of course wrong. An employer is never obliged to provide a reference and a letter of dismissal saying that they will provide a basic reference is in no way a legally binding contract to do so.

    OP, don't spend a lot of money on that "civil case" that Milkshock tells you you have because it will be money wasted.
  • Milkshock
    Milkshock Posts: 402 Forumite
    edited 25 September 2011 at 2:51PM
    SarEl wrote: »
    And since this as much twaddle as everything else you have posted, it is of course wrong. An employer is never obliged to provide a reference and a letter of dismissal saying that they will provide a basic reference is in no way a legally binding contract to do so.

    OP, don't spend a lot of money on that "civil case" that Milkshock tells you you have because it will be money wasted.

    are you saying there can be no way an employer can sign a legally binding contract to provide a reference?

    because if you are, that is also twaddle
  • SarEl
    SarEl Posts: 5,683 Forumite
    Milkshock wrote: »
    are you saying there can be no way an employer can sign a legally binding contract to provide a reference?

    No - I am saying that this statement in a dismissal letter isn't a legally binding contract, and that is the last correspondence on this issue I will have with you. The OP can believe who they want but I do not correspond with trolls, and especailly not ones who use the personal grief of bereaved posters to have sly digs at other posters who haven't even posted. You are a nasty piece of work having fun misadvising and misleading people for your own entertainment, and it's just as well that we are all out of your reach or you might pours drinks over us.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.