ESA Tests and Mental Health

cosmic-dust

:rotfl:
That just tickled me so much.
Because some posters don't actually believe all the rubbish people post on the internet we are classed as stalkers and ATOS protectors :rotfl:

I gave you a personal account of a family member and ATOS but no that wasn't good enough for you, you would much rather believe all the scaremongering going on within the interweb.

Why should the ATOS rep input into your little witch hut, why should they stoop to your level. I would guess no matter what the rep said you and the ATOS haters would harass them all the time.

Transformer wrote: »

There are three posters on here who are the stalkers, fridge, cosmic dust and seven day weekend. Anyone would think you are atos protectors.

So it is not possible for anyone to question atos without getting attacked, let alone from other posters.

I say again atos has nowt to worry about being recorded and if you had good experience, great, but I dont see many posting positively. I dont read newspaper articles or in the news of people happy with assesors who are disabled.

I also done see it a problem to point out the official atos rep is not bothering to input.

Simple how do they assess the mentally ill if not experienced or medically trained in that area, as touching your knees does not do it. I am a poster asking the question, not needing to be ridiculed for wanting reasurance after reading many negative stories.

If other posters think my posts OTT then dont reply you have the option to ignore:D

cosmic-dust

cit_k wrote: »

Hardly stalking, ATOS turned up, then have gone silent. Fair comment to wonder where they are.

What are your views on people stalking me?

Should the ATOS rep be here 24/7 just to reply to the ATOS haters? Or should they be allowed to post on here when they like just as every other member can do.

Do people stalk you? I wouldn't know. I'm sure you can report your concerns through official channels, rather than ask others what they think.

Fridge3

Transformer wrote: »

Fridge3 wrote: »

It's your prerogative to have who you choose on ignore.

That does not stop those who are on ignore from responding to your posts for the benefit of other posters. Nor should it be able to, as to do so would be censorship.

What gives you the idea you have special priviledges to TELL other posters where, how or who they may post in reply to, or on which threads? Smacks of hypocrisy given your comments on censorship in this very thread.

It's noted that you choose to selectively view posts but then fail to respond to what is actually posted when you do so - not exactly in line with forum etiqutte. End quote.
...............................

Sorry fridge, I didnt realise you were a moderator.:cool:

Could we get back on topic please and stop with the digs.

Will atos respond to how they deal with mentally ill clients to reasure against what we have read in many forums, stories on news etc.....refering to disabled feeling not treat fairly by assesors?

Nor have I claimed to be.

You're new around here but I'm sure you wouldn't approve of censorship, being told what you could and couldn't post in response to? And, on topic, isn't censorship one of the points another poster has made against atos?

cosmic-dust

cit_k wrote: »

Clicky here, read links.

Let's deal with facts.

Oldernotwiser

Transformer wrote: »

Honest enough, you mean lucky enough !!!!!!!!:p

No - I meant what I said.

Oldernotwiser

cit_k wrote: »

Just because you get a decision you agree with, does not mean problems did not occur with the assessment.

So - damned if you do, damned if you don't!

Fridge3

Transformer wrote: »

Mistake, right:rotfl: More like target driven I can only suspect, but unless atos in put we just have to guess and stay nervous of trusting them.

Interesting how a posters opinion appears to be taken as fact.

Oldernotwiser

cit_k wrote: »

Hardly stalking, ATOS turned up, then have gone silent. Fair comment to wonder where they are.

What are your views on people stalking me?

I think that you're the stalker and bully - not ATOS.

seven-day-weekend

Transformer wrote: »

I AM NO ATOS HATER. I AM NO ATOS JUDGER. I HAVE READ STORIES FROM WHO I BELIEVE, AS WHY WOULD THEY POST SUCH DISTRESS FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO TALK TO OTHERS AND WARN THEM. WE ARE TOLD TO EXPECT TO BE FAILED SO NOT TO DISTRESSED AND THEN GO TO APPEAL AND TRIBUNAL IF NECC EVEN PRIOR TO FIRST ASSESMENT BY ENOUGH PEOPLE TO INDICATE A PROBLEM DOES EXIST !!!!!!!!!!!

Questioning these read experiences and articles from I believe it was mental health charity of that nature who themselves raised concerns re the treatment of the mentally ill.

ARE THEY ALL WRONG?

When my time comes if I have positive result I will post that to reasure others too, but that does not make those concerned atos haters for wanting a response you who just want to ridicule.

Anyone would think you either work for them or have someone who does nearby you painting the daily mail approach of all who claim sickness benefits, now that would be a judgement, but just as wild as yours.

My husband claims a sickness Benefit. I am not a Benefit-Basher.

seven-day-weekend

Oldernotwiser wrote: »

I think that you're the stalker and bully - not ATOS.

here here.... .