The "have a look at this!" thread II

deviruchi

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-33579276.html

Lots of over enthusiastic photo taking:

• Is a close up of the (admittedly private) lift button really necessary (photo 7), especially when the previous photo shows the lift?
• 12 & 13 attempts at 'arty' shots
• 30 is an odd one, doesn't really say £1m+ property...
• Another unnecessary close up, this time of the sink (32), again in the previous photo this is included!

winspiration

deviruchi wrote: »

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-33579276.html

Lots of over enthusiastic photo taking:

• Is a close up of the (admittedly private) lift button really necessary (photo 7), especially when the previous photo shows the lift?
• 12 & 13 attempts at 'arty' shots
• 30 is an odd one, doesn't really say £1m+ property...
• Another unnecessary close up, this time of the sink (32), again in the previous photo this is included!

I think it looks horrible actually - apart from maybe the balcony. I don't think the interior reflects the outside of the building at all, it looks more like office type accommodation & furnishings. If I had £1m+ to splash out on a property, it wouldn't be going on this one!

Riq

ScarletMarble wrote: »

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-55404896.html?premiumA=true

Why wallpaper panels on the door in pic 4?

Yuk, cooking fat stains on wall and ceiling, pic 5. I can smell the fat from just looking at the photo.

Sky obviously photoshopped

moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »

Photo 7 is a bit the "odd one out" there - one of those beds in it is a more recent purchase and there for a child. Whereas the rest of the house hasn't been touched/had a single new purchase since the 1970s. That's puzzling me - as houses that haven't been touched since the owner moved in are basically normally 1980s now (ie the owner got it together when they first moved in and didn't do anything since - and has now just died).

clint_S wrote: »

Grandchild sleeping over?

I just think it's sad, you just know the child who lives in that house, or stays there has no chance in life. And is most probably massively obese.



Sweeping Assumptions!:money:

beanandbean

Upsidedown_Bear wrote: »

Don't forget your sunglasses when viewing :cool:
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-49179325.html

Oh wow.... but so many nice features hiding amongst the neon glare!!

Dandie89

New poster so not allowed to do links but perhaps someone could tweek it and tell me if that is the Twin Towers?!
rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53019940.html

arthurdick

Dandie89 wrote: »

New poster so not allowed to do links but perhaps someone could tweek it and tell me if that is the Twin Towers?!
rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53019940.html

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53019940.html

Davesnave

Dandie89 wrote: »

New poster so not allowed to do links but perhaps someone could tweek it and tell me if that is the Twin Towers?!
rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53019940.html

Yes, they are, but they're entirely in keeping with the environment in which they've been placed IMO.

RuthnJasper

downshifter wrote: »

If you want to live in Shetland (and I certainly do) you could have a whole island for less than the price of a shoebox in London:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-37280895.html

or this for less than the price of a shoe in London:

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-50828228.html

..though after being for sale for ages, the latter is now under offer.

Dreams.............

Very nice (once done up)... I wonder why it's supposedly so haunted?

RuthnJasper

Upsidedown_Bear wrote: »

Don't forget your sunglasses when viewing :cool:
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-49179325.html

Pic 5... WHYWHYWHY?!?

RuthnJasper

Dandie89 wrote: »

New poster so not allowed to do links but perhaps someone could tweek it and tell me if that is the Twin Towers?!
rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-53019940.html

Yes; definitely the World Trade Centre.