DLA Troubles - ATOS liars!

Fridge3

FTW wrote: »

You could just answer the question and then that'll stop you from being asked. Or don't you have the courage to do that?

It's your choice to keep asking, just as it's mine not to post all kinds of personal information about my experience. Common sense to anyone who doesn't need allowances made as above.

FTW

Fridge3 wrote: »

It's your choice to keep asking, just as it's mine not to post all kinds of personal information about my experience. Common sense to anyone who doesn't need allowances made as above.

Then that would automatically cancel out any credibility you have to call into question anyone else's more informed/experienced perceptions of Atoss.

Unless you would like to state what your own experience of these assessments is - then that would add substantial credibility to what you have to say on the subject.

If you consider yourself more informed than others about the process involved, then what's the problem with stating why you do think that?

But until then, we'll just have to assume that you're simply a bigot shilling for Atoss.

I'm not stating that as a fact, you understand - just that the inability to answer a perfectly straight question reeks of Atoss all over.

But when you say 'personal information', I take it that you mean information that compromises your identity - which I don't recall ever asking you to reveal.

cit_k

FTW wrote: »

Then that would automatically cancel out any credibility you have to call into question anyone else's more informed/experienced perceptions of Atoss.

Unless you would like to state what your own experience of these assessments is - then that would add substantial credibility to what you have to say on the subject.

If you consider yourself more informed than others about the process involved, then what's the problem with stating why you do think that?

But until then, we'll just have to assume that you're simply a bigot shilling for Atoss.

I'm not stating that as a fact, you understand - just that the inability to answer a perfectly straight question reeks of Atoss all over.

But when you say 'personal information', I take it that you mean information that compromises your identity - which I don't recall ever asking you to reveal.

To me, the part you quoted, this part

It's your choice to keep asking, just as it's mine not to post all kinds of personal information about my experience. Common sense to anyone who doesn't need allowances made as above.

when taken into consideration with the statement the poster has not 'used' atos (so therefore not a claimaint), and the fact the first statement is clearly stating they do have experience of it, shows to me, they must be working for atos, or the dwp, or tribunal service, or some other organisation, or body involved in the process.

Unless someone else can explain an alernative, if your not a claimaint, and you have 'all kinds of personal information' about your experience of ATOS benefit assessments?

FTW

cit_k wrote: »

To me, the part you quoted, this part



when taken into consideration with the statement the poster has not 'used' atos (so therefore not a claimaint), and the fact the first statement is clearly stating they do have experience of it, shows to me, they must be working for atos, or the dwp, or tribunal service, or some other organisation, or body involved in the process.

Unless someone else can explain an alernative, if your not a claimaint, and you have 'all kinds of personal information' about your experience of ATOS benefit assessments?

Well, it would have to be Atoss - the guy spends far too much time obsessively defending them for it to be anyone else.

I've said it before - classic case of a call-jockey who's spent far too long in the job.

Thus, he takes his job far too seriously - to the point where he feels compelled to defend the company against even the mildest form of criticism.

A 'live to work' type, rather than 'work to live' - I feel sorry for him in a way, but not too much.

NASA_2

Couldnt be bothered reading any of the thread but I take it this is another whinge about not being given other peoples tax money?

Oldernotwiser

FTW wrote: »

A 'live to work' type, rather than 'work to live' - I feel sorry for him in a way, but not too much.

Better than "living while everyone else works"!

FTW

NASA wrote: »

Couldnt be bothered reading any of the thread but I take it this is another whinge about not being given other peoples tax money?

No. It's a thread about Atoss lying - again.

FTW

Oldernotwiser wrote: »

Better than "living while everyone else works"!

Everyone else isn't working though.

Fridge3

FTW wrote: »

Then that would automatically cancel out any credibility you have to call into question anyone else's more informed/experienced perceptions of Atoss.

Unless you would like to state what your own experience of these assessments is - then that would add substantial credibility to what you have to say on the subject.

If you consider yourself more informed than others about the process involved, then what's the problem with stating why you do think that?

But until then, we'll just have to assume that you're simply a bigot shilling for Atoss.

I'm not stating that as a fact, you understand - just that the inability to answer a perfectly straight question reeks of Atoss all over.

But when you say 'personal information', I take it that you mean information that compromises your identity - which I don't recall ever asking you to reveal.

Personal information need not necessarily be mine and can include others' personal information. Not a good idea to reveal such things on a forum, FB etc, I'm sure you'll agree, especially when specifics may make certain individuals identifiable. You keep responding on behalf of cit who's managed to grasp it's quite possible to have experience without being a claimant, indeed listed possibilities on a couple of occasions. Perhaps he could translate for you?

Fridge3

FTW wrote: »

Everyone else isn't working though.

No, but in context of this thread, 93% are identified as capable of some work. As you suggest, perhaps attitude is a barrier to working in some cases.