We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Oh dear,poor Rupert
Comments
-
Shame they removed the cowpats before allowing the public in.0
-
Apparently when they told the queue for the public gallery they couldn't take in their cowpats, two thirds of those queuing went home!0
-
If the attacker had any sense of irony, he would have used a rolled-up copy of the NOTW to attack Murdoch."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0
-
The worst bit is that this distracts from the real issue that this poor, weak 80 year-old has been rogering the news, police and politicians for 40 years and now the papers will be full of 'plucky' wife, and idiot 'comedian' who wanted attention.0
-
I've always disliked Murdoch, primarily because I do not agree with any non British resident having the power that comes from owning so much of the British media.
However, it took a great deal of guts for him to go and meet the Dowler family after what those scumbags did to them. That counts for something. And kicking someone when they are down as this clown did is pretty reprehensible in itself.
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Do you honestly think he went to see them because he gave a toss!
It's called damage limitation.
He is a ruthless businessman who's only interest is his companys bottom line, and wouldn't care if it was a policeman, politician, employee, rival, or bereaved family he destroyed whilst protecting it!
Olias0 -
The worst bit is that this distracts from the real issue that this poor, weak 80 year-old has been rogering the news, police and politicians for 40 years and now the papers will be full of 'plucky' wife, and idiot 'comedian' who wanted attention.
EXACTLY which is probably what the intention was. A distraction.0 -
Do you honestly think he went to see them because he gave a toss!
It's called damage limitation.
You're a 'glass half empty', kind of person, aren't you olias?
The amount of extra damage limitation that would have been achieved by his going there in person rather than sending others is as close to nil as you can get.
I've never liked the man, nor his political influence, but that does not make him purely evil.
I suggest that you try and get a sense of proportion.There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.0 -
Glad to see 'most' people aren't condoning the foam attack. It was plain idiotic, and not right at all.0
-
im sure the blond asking the questions was one of the mps who claimed expenses fraudulently as i remember them taking the mick out of her on hignfu im not sure shes the right person to judge the murdocksReplies to posts are always welcome, If I have made a mistake in the post, I am human, tell me nicely and it will be corrected. If your reply cannot be nice, has an underlying issue, or you believe that you are God, please post in another forum. Thank you0
-
The attack was disgraceful. If Parliament security can't ensure the safety of an 80 year old what message it does it send out to the next person who is summoned to a hearing. I would certainly think twice about appearing and putting myself in harms way, it may not be a paper plate and shaving foam next time.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards