Civil Enforcements / Norwich Pharmacal Order

notts_phil

NEWS JUST IN. CASE STRUCK OUT.

confirmed by the court!!

Yippee.:)

peter_the_piper

Great news So its F.O to the ppc. Glad its cost them a bundle for no result. Keep a note of the case number etc so we can use it when others are threatened.

esmerobbo

Good news. Its a pity the NP didn't come back and let us know, as this would put the original claim to bed as well. I hope their litigation manager, has more of these new strategies!:p

Coblcris

An NPO for such a small claim is clearly not proportionate and even the best advocate would have a job to convince the Court otherwise.

excelfighter

*************************************IMPORTANT UPDATE*************************************

I have set up a new account to give this information.......

I have just rung Navide AKbar the litigation manager @ EXCEL/VCS for a chat

He started of by saying he had been trying to get hold of me etc and said the court line was always busy(not true???)

I then told him of the judges finding(CPR section 31 not applying etc etc). He stated they did not receive the court documents until saturday so were unable to make the hearing and would be applying to have it set aside.

So he is going to make a fresh application to the court for a new hearing and have the case reinstated etc.

He said he didn't believe that the car owner wouldn't know who was driving and who had no responsibility to who was ever driving. He accepted that the defendant was not the driver.

I asked him to make comment directly on the website but he said he had no need to go on these sites as they were a play ground for children. I told him they were used to give people their rights back. He said this was scandalous

He advised he would be making this aware when the case is next hear (it doesnt matter that help has come from a website) , the judge wont look down on this.

He said he was very confident he would get this overturned on appeal when he could test the defendant (ie on the issues on who was driving etc). He was also considering taking the matter to the highest court

In the end its fair to to say he was getting pretty het up.

************

Can someone copy and paste this on to CAG and PEPIPOO. Looks like the defendant will need to know this.

AlexisV

The bloke's a liability.

cirian75

sounds to me like someone called his bluff and he does not like it.

notts_phil

cirian75 wrote: »

sounds to me like someone called his bluff and he does not like it.

Quite lol hehe

notts_phil

The OP has confirmed by pm that the case is still going ahead. This seems odd as they accept the guy wasn't the driver. I wonder if the journalist from the star is going. I most certainly am(is in melting mowbray 18th 20pm). Prehaps we shouldn't have been so cynical of the poster!!

esmerobbo

So their going for a breach of contract against the RK who they admit they know wasn't there? Should be an interesting argument! If of course VCS turn up! Once the OP wins or VCS don't turn up I hope they go after costs!