driving uninsured - help/advise

vax2002

Are you trying to be a TIT on purpose

crazy_house

Woody. wrote: »

If your covered and have proof there should have been no charge for recovery and storage. When you produced and all is in order they should have stamped your 165 form 'no charge'.

The police station advised i needed to recover money from insurer as there at fault as my details were not on there. But as pointed out in beging the car was DUAL insured until 25th may causing the issue with mid

What really got my back up is the large a3 sized sticker on back & rear windows saying

" ANOTHER UNINSURED VEHICLE OFF THE ROADS"
guilty until proven inocent

:j and this what i think to po

PeteMate

Erm... The DVLA doesn't own our cars. That's nonsense.

One of the main questions for any car insurance quote is 'are you the OWNER and registered keeper of the vehicle'

If the DVLA owned the car, that question would be a tad irrelevant.

Woody._2

vax2002 wrote: »

Are you trying to be a TIT on purpose

I only ask because of what you said.

vax2002 wrote: »

Read the registration certificate you are not the owner, you are the "registered Keeper" DVLA OWN the car as long as it is registered to them

Woody._2

crazy_house wrote: »

The police station advised i needed to recover money from insurer as there at fault as my details were not on there.

That's wrong they shouldn't have charged you.

crazy_house

Woody. wrote: »

Who owns that car then?

whoever is named on v5 as being the registered owner

ther dvla is another database to obtain & collect as much info as possible, but even that database can be wrong.

:doh:

pompeyfaith

I am insured – swinton still insuring me - The bank cancelled wrong direct debit. – but nobody will admit to being at fault

Then the bank is responsible for your loses, so make a formal complaint to your bank also.

pompeyfaith

A V5 is not proof of ownership only registered keeper the only way to proof ownership is a bill of sale.

A bill of sale is just as if not more important than a V5

Woody._2

pompeyfaith wrote: »

A V5 is not proof of ownership only registered keeper the only way to proof ownership is a bill of sale.

A bill of sale is just as if not more important than a V5

Both are a waste of time according to vax2002, who thinks the DVLA own all registered cars.:rotfl:

crazy_house

Woody. wrote: »

Both are a waste of time according to vax2002, who thinks the DVLA own all registered cars.:rotfl:

:rotfl: shall we agree to disagree and say aliens own all car :rotfl:

It makes know difference because if your name on v5 you the one who get left witb bills/fines