TV Licensing harassment letters

Looksguywalker

caela wrote: »

I tell you what I'm not interested in, this pointless conversation. Closing this window now bye bye

...ah someone who bails out when questioned...says it all really. You really don't help your cause.

The_Safordian

caela wrote: »

I tell you what I'm not interested in, this pointless conversation. Closing this window now bye bye

Any and all criticism of the BBC here gets the same treatment and the fact they keep abusing the forum rules in this manner speaks for itself. You made a valid point related to the actual discussion unlike certain other people.

You have to wonder what these "people" are doing clicking on threads they have no interest in!

Looksguywalker

The_Safordian wrote: »

Any and all criticism of the BBC here gets the same treatment and the fact they keep abusing the forum rules in this manner speaks for itself. You made a valid point related to the actual discussion unlike certain other people.

You have to wonder what these "people" are doing clicking on threads they have no interest in!

I have abused no rules and yet your mate has wandered odd? Why?

vuvuzela

The_Safordian wrote: »

Any and all criticism of the BBC here gets the same treatment and the fact they keep abusing the forum rules in this manner speaks for itself. You made a valid point related to the actual discussion unlike certain other people.

You have to wonder what these "people" are doing clicking on threads they have no interest in!

I like how when you had to find a fact to back up an argument, you went to the BBC news website https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/54019981#Comment_54019981
You do realise that the licence fee helps run this ?
I thought that with your outspoken anti-BBC stance you wouldn't have dreamed using their service. Hypocrite much ?

The_Safordian

Looksguywalker wrote: »

I have abused no rules and yet your mate has wandered odd? Why?

Attacking someone for contributing towards a thread clearly goes against this

Keep threads on topic and boards running smoothly

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/site/forum-faqs

There is no need to go off-topic and attack someone, if you have issues then you are supposed to contact the moderation team instead of doing what you have.

Oh and please do tell who this mate is, you are giving yourself away again.

vuvuzela wrote: »

I like how when you had to find a fact to back up an argument, you went to the BBC news website https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/54019981#Comment_54019981
You do realise that the licence fee helps run this ?
I thought that with your outspoken anti-BBC stance you wouldn't have dreamed using their service. Hypocrite much ?

I noticed you didn't argue with the BBC as a source, I know you wouldn't

Once again I will not be baited with off-topic attacks. I have said certain individuals have an agenda and the above speaks for itself. I remind him/her of the rules I've just quoted

bazster

The_Safordian wrote: »

I have said certain individuals have an agenda

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

[Deleted User]

Oliver14 wrote: »

So they wont even bother waiting now and go straight for the court order to grant access.

If they do that with me, they're going to finish up with chicken ovulation on their face.

[Deleted User]

Azari wrote: »

If they don't, then they don't have any less because you wrote them some stupid letter.

They will have less right of access, and it's not "some stupid letter".

TVL state they DO respect Withdrawal of Implied Right of Access.

TV_Licensing_Enforcement_Visiting_Procedures wrote:

7.13 Withdrawn implied rights of access must be respected by TV Licensing since EOs would be committing trespass if they visited the address after the right of access had been withdrawn.

(emphasis is mine)

[Deleted User]

oldone wrote: »

This forum is about money saving not breaking the law, or encouraging, people to act illegally.

I'm neither breaking the law, nor encouraging anyone to do so.

I'm LLF, and encourage others to become the same.

when without too much difficulty they can be traced via their ISP and IP address.

I can't be.

[Deleted User]

musicmaker29 wrote: »

I didn't need to get into a song and dance about it, everything was dealt with calmly and properly.

That's not the experience of several people I know.

I do think that if you receive a TV signal then you should pay though.

I agree.