Good News for all

Sirdan

HO87 wrote: »

You have repeated this question in such a way as to suggest that either you know what the answer is (and are trying to test taffy in some way); that you are being mischievious in some way or are otherwise unable to use Google?

You can read for yourself what the relevant clause says here. Individual paragraphs in Bills before Parliament are called clauses. Only on being enacted are they called sections.

Clause or section matters not what was being discussed is Schedule 4.

peter_the_piper

Schedul4rules is a bit of a lightweight, he only lasted 20 posts. I expected better.

trisontana

peter_the_piper wrote: »

Schedul4rules is a bit of a lightweight, he only lasted 20 posts. I expected better.

He may have been kicked off the forum for not only breaking forum rules about "company spokesmen", but also these BPA guidelines:-

..set yourself up a profile for that site that is clear that you are from your company

Do not start responding under an alias or made up profile – you need to be completely transparent.

As to who he actually was, and which PPC he works for, is open to debate.

Whatdoiknow

I must firstly say that I am no expert on here, I will even admit that I actually paid one of these "fines" a few years ago before I ever knew of this site, but I keep regular tabs as in another life I am a Car Administrator so sometimes get these stupid notices.

From what i understand even if they could hold the RK responsible they would still have to do court and as has been said many times "they" don't do court.

Recently we had a couple of letters from our friends at Roxburghe for one of our company car drivers, in one they actually broke BPA guidelines by stating that even now the RK would be responsible for the penalty.

I basically wrote back (yes I know I shouldn't have, but wanted a bit of a laugh) and told them to **** off in the nicest possible way of course pointing out that their statement was actually illegal and that if they persisted we would involve, plod, OFT and TS.

They of course ran off with their tail between their legs replying quite swiftly that they were no longer dealing with this case and had returned it to the parking company to which we have never heard from at all.