Have the thread police been

immoral_angeluk

Al_Mac wrote:

No they don't. This site is owned by Martin Lewis and he has to protect his a$$ from being sued

I missed martin lewis' bum too??? Damn it!!

BlueSkyDay

which thread has gone?

amosworks

GreyPilgrim wrote:

Good job it aint licenced, huh?

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

**High-5's**

rog2

moozie wrote:

I doubt it or the Television thread would have been moved to rants :rolleyes:

I think it has, Moozie. :beer:

rainbowrisin

What's happened? Why was it deleted? When I popped off to do some work for an hour it was all quite amicableish (amicableish isn't a proper word, is it?)..now I come back and it's vanished.
...or am I not meant to mention it and history will be re-written as if it's never been.
Anyone give some info in general terms (without re-hashing what is clearly deemed unsuitable territory) on how things went?...or is that sailing too close to the wind?
I've never posted on a thread that's been deleted before - I expect my name's on a database now - rainbow's card is marked.:eek:

amosworks

The TV tax thread hasn't been moved or deleted? It's on Page 2 :rolleyes:
You newbies

Edit:
Yes it has been deleted now, it was there but refreshed and it's gone. One of my many useful posts which ends up deleted. If people read the stuff I post instead of deleting it maybe they wouldn't be in debt :rolleyes: But you can't keep a good !!!!! down I suppose :money:

rainbowrisin

amosworks wrote:

The TV tax thread hasn't been moved or deleted? It's on Page 2 :rolleyes:
You newbies

Can't find it on page 2, or even page 3 or 4 - and I just get "invalid thread" when I search for it.
Never mind, will go and have a shower and write a couple of complaint letters to various corporations I'm at war with instead - sometimes I wish I drank;)

Nelski

amosworks wrote:

I just realised, and it's quite obvious, that Martin's the BBC's biatch. He wouldn't dare say anything against them as they 0wn him and he wouldn't want to see them losing any of that gorgeous license fee now would we? :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money: :money:

Maybe he just doesnt like anyone who thinks its ok to break the law and then brag about it on his FREE site. Did you decide tonight was your PPR night cos I reckon youre on right route mate:D.

moozie_2

amosworks wrote:

I just realised, and it's quite obvious, that Martin's the BBC's biatch. He wouldn't dare say anything against them as they 0wn him and he wouldn't want to see them losing any of that gorgeous license fee now would we?

So much venom for no need what so ever I don't know what's up with you tonight but it's not pleasant to read. Try to not let things get to you so much Amos.

amosworks

Don't give me the break the law lecture love. MSE is a tight rope as it is and many things practically border on fraud and obtaining things by deception. I don't have a problem with this but you can get off your high horse already.

Whether TV tax is legal or not is some debate that can rage elsewhere but I find it quite sad/funny (not sure which yet) that this free site (well obviously not free speech love ) that giving people information on a definite legal way of saving 3 months TV license a year should be removed.

And there was me thinking that the DFW was board was to get out of debt. Looks like I was mistaken there, mate.

x