Re-Mapping Complications

Inactive

bigjl wrote: »

Yes, on you go, though why are you picking me up on my spelling now, you didn't the first time you read it, though you had to think of a witty reply, didn't you, eh.

Whats the matter, upset due to not actually understanding my previous post, and when you tried to be smart you made yourself look silly.

Seriously if you have nothing constructive to add why no just stop posting.

The last resort of the TROLL, look for small spelling mistakes.

You are the " adult ".. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

bigjl

Troll..............

espresso

bigjl wrote: »

Whats the matter, upset due to not actually understanding my previous post, and when you tried to be smart you made yourself look silly.

Probably upset because his sidekick Isaac can no longer post on here.

:rotfl:

Gerrard_8_lfc

Yeah its a 90bhp Tdi Model, The higher the breakhorse power the TDI letter's become red.

I think I may just leave it getting bumped up its been a great little car and has always drove without problem so Id hate to do something to change that. Only down side is it can be quite sluggish. One problem is when you go view some of the faster Golfs is the owner always hits out with a horror statement i.e " ayes she a pure beauty, Fast as F*ck can dae 60 mph in 2nd gear" :shocked:. Thanks but no thanks.

Expensive Wee Cars are Golfs.

Cheers for all the advice guys

Inactive

espresso wrote: »

Probably upset because his sidekick Isaac can no longer post on here.

:rotfl:

????????????

skiddlydiddly

bigjl wrote: »

The SDi (non turbo) only had about 65/70bhp, the 90 was only available in TDi. Back in 2001 I think they had stopped making the 110 in favour of the 115, though may be wrong on that. I seem to remember that the 90 had an all silver TDi badge, the 110 had a red i. There was also a TDi with a red Di, not sure if that was a 130 or 115, though I think the 115 replaced the 110 and the 130 was intrioduced as a top spec model.

But the 90 is definately turbo charged, not sure but I think the 90 wasn't intercooled, whereas the 110 was.

I am sure a VAG enthusiast will be along with more detailed info.

Yes but the OP doesn't say if its diesel or petrol.I'd imagine either an older basic 1.6/1.8 would produce around 90 bhp too.

bigjl

Most people when they talk about a Golf or VAG car in the terms, 90, 115 and 130 are referring to diesels.

I think we can safely assume the OP owns a diesel, not least because remapping a normally aspirated car will onl ygive a few bhp, not the kind of increases the OP wants.

I definately think the OP has a diesel.

Inactive

bigjl wrote: »

Most people when they talk about a Golf or VAG car in the terms, 90, 115 and 130 are referring to diesels.

I think we can safely assume the OP owns a diesel, not least because remapping a normally aspirated car will onl ygive a few bhp, not the kind of increases the OP wants.

I definately think the OP has a diesel.

The OP has actually told us which engine it is at post Number 45.

Perhaps you may have noticed it if you hadn't been so busy throwing insults around.

espresso

Inactive wrote: »

????????????

You know very well what I'm talking about. At least two threads have been posted complaining about the Dumb and Dumber double act on this board.

Other readers - read post #2 carefully.

skiddlydiddly

bigjl wrote: »

Most people when they talk about a Golf or VAG car in the terms, 90, 115 and 130 are referring to diesels.

I think we can safely assume the OP owns a diesel, not least because remapping a normally aspirated car will onl ygive a few bhp, not the kind of increases the OP wants.

I definately think the OP has a diesel.

Heheh so do I now they actually posted what it was.It would have made it simpler if it was included in the 1st post though .
I know some of the tdi's produce those power levels, but so do some of the older 1.6/1.8 & gtis too(115/130).