We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Cambelt Change Con!
Comments
-
found this link for clio cambelt location http://www.retro-renault.com/forums/renault-1997-present-day/9894-clio-1-4-16v.html0
-
she should have got it done by the dealer included in the deal before she bought the car. any decent dealer would have done it anyway.Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.0
-
found this link for clio cambelt location http://www.retro-renault.com/forums/renault-1997-present-day/9894-clio-1-4-16v.html
0 -
I suspect that’s another embarrassed red face avoided thanks to MSE

0 -
It was the wrong belt, I feel a little silly now yet relieved. Good job the garage wasn't open when I checked lol!
Looking at the how to guide the appropriate parts to be removed show they have by the bolts. Is there anyway of seeing the belt without taking the engine off for peace of mind? It's a 2002 1.2 16v Clio.
Thanks a lot for all your help!0 -
Ben, it may be worth asking them about the pulleys and tensioners if you intend to get in touch. Many people change the belt without considering what keeps the belt in place.
A case in point. I bought a car which showed a timing belt change within the manufacturer's mileage guidelines. A few months later, a tensioner failure resulted in some (fortunately not spectacular) damage which cost over £1,000 to correct. On inspection, the belt had been replaced, but the pulleys and tensioners were original equipment.
Anyone embarking on a timing belt change should, as a matter of course, change the belt, pulleys, tensioners and even consider a precautionary water-pump change.
Good luck,
IanI am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Happy to help - easy mistake to make.
I agree with the post re. pulleys and tensioners. Also, the auxiliary belts are usually such a cheap easy job, I'd always get the lot changed with the cambelt.My PV system: South West England, 10x 250Wp Trina Solar panels, Fronius Inverter, South facing roof, 35° pitch with no shading.0 -
-
kingstreet wrote: ».
Anyone embarking on a timing belt change should, as a matter of course, change the belt, pulleys, tensioners and even consider a precautionary water-pump change.
Perhaps a little over cautious ? tensioner Probably and pulleys if the bearings seem worn. But I would refer to the service manual.
My Kia says belt and tensioner at 60,000. Pulleys were fine.... Water Pump.....I think notNO to pasty tax We won!!!! Just shows that people power works! Don't be apathetic to your cause!0 -
Perhaps a little over cautious ? tensioner Probably and pulleys if the bearings seem worn. But I would refer to the service manual.
My Kia says belt and tensioner at 60,000. Pulleys were fine.... Water Pump.....I think not
Rather you than me.
Full kit, belt, pullies, tensioner, and water pump, every time.
Cost difference to not doing them is less than a tank of petrol.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
