Reasonable Cause

ppc_guy

Paste me anywhere where i have said i have no intent of taking anyone to court?

taffy056

ppc_guy wrote: »

Paste me anywhere where i have said i have no intent of taking anyone to court?

You have stated on here that you have never taken anyone to the small claims, now tell me how many times have you got the RK details and done nothing except send threatograms ? So going on past form it can be surmised that won't change in the future!

Fergie76

ppc_guy wrote: »

Paste me anywhere where i have said i have no intent of taking anyone to court?

ppc_guy wrote: »

For me to issue court summons alone takes time then the time taken to go to court and so on would not justify the effort needed.

ppc_guy wrote: »

Never taken anyone to court. Is it worth the hassle for a £75 ticket?

..........

esmerobbo

ppc_guy wrote: »

Also in answer to your questions the PPC solely provides the vehicle index number when using the EL with the DVLA.

On another thread we have a poster, her daughter received a invoice for Luton airport on her VRM. As she was hundreds of miles away it seems the PPC entered the wrong VRM, by the DVLA giving her details on the VRM alone the issuing of her and anybodys data is incorrect.

Hadeon

Game, set & match!!

Fergie76

ppc_guy wrote: »

Also in answer to your questions the PPC solely provides the vehicle index number when using the EL with the DVLA however when using the V888/2 form the PPC must provide the vehicle make model and colour.

Also why don't you have to provide proof of the alleged offence, as we all know PPC's are less than trustworthy?

ppc_guy

They arent offences remember.. Civil matter not an offence.

Because we have never taken anyone to court doesnt mean we dont have the intent. (and note i said for £75... if a person has X tickets it may become worth my time)

Fergie76

ppc_guy wrote: »

They arent offences remember.. Civil matter not an offence.

Because we have never taken anyone to court doesnt mean we dont have the intent. (and note i said for £75... if a person has X tickets it may become worth my time)

So what you are saying is you have no intent to take someone to court for one invoice, but if they have more you may?

So, all the times you have had used the DVLA database, so far is fraudulent?

I believe you have no intent to of taking someone to court!

ppc_guy

Well two issues arise then..
a) Who am I?
b) I always have the intent but sometimes not the inclination.

All data i request can be done under the list of offence above as parking in a place without authorisation so i am covered in any respect.

I didnt come here to argue with you BUT im just bemused at why you all spend your time posting this unrequired garble. EVERYONE that reads the threads on here will know that your advice (as a forum not you personally fergie) is to ignore. So what does it matter how the info is obtained in what manner and under what president? you ignore it and it costs you nothing it costs the PPCS as you have already stated. this thread to me as i have stated above is a pointless thread and shows a dog and bone attitue. Its a thread for the sake of making a thread.

Fergie76

ppc_guy wrote: »

Well two issues arise then..
a) Who am I?

Don't know.

ppc_guy wrote: »

b) I always have the intent but sometimes NEVER the inclination.

Sorted that for you.

ppc_guy wrote: »

All data i request can be done under the list of offence above as parking in a place without authorisation so i am covered in any respect.

So which one?

Cars parking on private property

Releasing vehicle information to landowners or their agents helps to find the keeper of a vehicle that has:

• obstructed access to land or property
• been abandoned on private property
• been parked without payment of the relevant fees
• been parked without the right to do so, eg in a space reserved for disabled motorists

ppc_guy wrote: »

I didnt come here to argue with you BUT im just bemused at why you all spend your time posting this unrequired garble.

Maybe your not, but I'm concerned about what knuckledragger gets hold of my information, although it hasn't happened to my knowledge yet, if they have my address, what is to stop them paying me visit?

ppc_guy wrote: »

So what does it matter how the info is obtained in what manner and under what president?

Because it's against the law to fraudulently obtain the details and also see above reply about the Neanderthals paying me a visit.

ppc_guy wrote: »

this thread to me as i have stated above is a pointless thread and shows a dog and bone attitue. Its a thread for the sake of making a thread.

So why contribute then? The better your type are out of business the better.