Colleague issue

RacyRed

Flyboy152 wrote: »

There is one great paradoxical issue with that. She is not a solicitor. She is a secretary.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

NB, Very confusing spam reported

starrystarry

^^ This guy makes about as much sense as MissDelilah :rotfl:

Flyboy152

starrystarry wrote: »

^^ This guy makes about as much sense as MissDelilah :rotfl:

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Nicki

starrystarry wrote: »

^^ This guy makes about as much sense as MissDelilah :rotfl:

When the spam gets removed anyone reading this is going to wonder what poor old racy red has said to deserve this comment

RacyRed

Nicki wrote: »

When the spam gets removed anyone reading this is going to wonder what poor old racy red has said to deserve this comment

PMSL! :rotfl: :A

Love it!

I'm having fun watching Wowgold's post count going up and down again as he keeps posting and the mods are deleting, he is all over the place! I think he maxed at 45 posts in less than 30 mins.

And I really want to know which rubbish translation prog he is using so I know to avoid it with a bargepole

1984ReturnsForReal_2

starrystarry wrote: »

^^ This guy makes about as much sense as MissDelilah :rotfl:

You may not like what MissDeliah said or the way they said it but it doesn't change the fact that its mostly an accurate reflection & fair opinion/comment.

starrystarry

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

You may not like what MissDeliah said or the way they said it but it doesn't change the fact that its mostly an accurate reflection & fair opinion/comment.

No, it was mostly a load of uninformed, biased, inconsistent codswallop by someone claiming to be in the legal profession.

ceridwen

MissDelilah wrote: »

I can't believe you're even writing this! How many of us women have tucked our skirts into our knickers and not realised until someone points it out? That's exposing underwear.

how many women and yes I've seen one - have flashed more bra/boob than they realised (and not in a pub/club environment)?

yes, if he goes commando, has a lose/broken zip or forgets to button up or whatever his jeans/underwear on return from the toilet then it could well be a mistake.

If I had a pound coin for every time my boyfriend forgot to zip up or did it half way in public I'd be earning a small sum. And no he's not a flasher.

..and I cant believe you are writing this...or maybe I can (as I was uneasy about a previous couple of posts you put....when it felt to me like you were "a trifle unwise" with what you were saying to Sho Me Da Money:cool:).

I'm not at all sure what you are playing at here...

ceridwen

MissDelilah wrote: »

!!!!!! - do you work in HR? nope - didn't think so. I work for a solicitors. They said they'd laugh this one out of court, for the precise reason, no proof. and the flimsy emails. oh and the total denial by the man. I think the police may well view this in the same way.

And if I recall correctly she hardly batted away or reported the underwear emails.

When you say you "work for a solicitors" - then let me forensically dissect that statement to interpret it as "I work in a solicitors office - but I am not actually a solicitor". I'll hazard a guess that you are a secretary - like that gives you a lot of authority to pontificate on the law:cool:

ceridwen

RacyRed wrote: »

I don't know how you can say this!

A guy sitting at a desk, wearing jeans, manages to accidentally expose his erect member to a female collegue and it is unintentional?

Chances of that happening have to be very slim indeed.

MissD, If you spoke to a solicitor about this you would have put your own slant on it during the telling, so I shall take your opinion and those connected with you with a very large pinch of salt. Please don't forget that 2 qualified solicitors have already posted on this thread and made their views very clear.

Hang on in there Gwen, he is fighting back, but the battle isn't over yet. (((hugs)))

Good post:T