Bank account raided - advice please

Loopy_Girl

I quite often multiple post as I remember something else....or I read something and want to comment.

Bite me.

alwayspuzzled

MIKEtheBIKE wrote: »

Before I carry on with the thread, I have spotted something suspicious that needs explaining.
KimYeovil has posted once.
AnxiousMum has posted twice
Loopy Girl has posted 3 times in a row.

Each of these people has been 'thanked' on every posting by gratefulforhelp.

gratefulforhelp has been 'thanked' over 59 THOUSAND times in less than 5 thousand posts.

Is this a CONSPIRACY???

What can it mean?

Surely it means that gratefulforhelp read the thread and agreed with/liked the posts made by others and so 'thanked' but had nothing constructive to add and moved on to another thread. I do this all the time - is this wrong???

Can't quite see where conspiracy comes into it?

MIKEtheBIKE_2

KimYeovil wrote: »

If you had paid the support no covert emptying would have been needed. Advice is pay your support in a more timely fasion.

I DID. CSA not listening.

MIKEtheBIKE_2

AnxiousMum wrote: »

Do you actually owe the child support monies?

No I don't.

MIKEtheBIKE_2

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Oh yeah...I forgot about your conspiricy thougts....*sigh*..QUOTE]


Where did that come from???

MIKEtheBIKE_2

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

So was it a business account you had? Or were you using a personal account for business transactions (which I believe most banks don't allow)

NO. and Yes. And yes they do.

MIKEtheBIKE_2

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Bite me.

That's not very constructive.

MIKEtheBIKE_2

alwayspuzzled wrote: »

had nothing constructive to add QUOTE]


Apparently not.

MIKEtheBIKE_2

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Oh yeah...I forgot about your conspiricy thougts....*sigh*...no company is going to phone and say "just to let you know Mike, we are going to hit your account with an arrestment in 2 days time so could you keep all your money in it" are they? So as you were told before, there is nothing 'secretive' about iyt - perfectly legal and above board.

23
Lump sum deduction orders
After section 32D of the Child Support Act 199(6)
The Commission shall serve a copy of any order made under this section on— (a)
the deposit-taker or third party at which it is directed;

(b)
the liable person; and

(c)
if the order is made in respect of a joint account, the other account-holders






Does this mean before the money is taken or after the money is taken?

gratefulforhelp_2

MIKEtheBIKE wrote: »

Before I carry on with the thread, I have spotted something suspicious that needs explaining.
KimYeovil has posted once.
AnxiousMum has posted twice
Loopy Girl has posted 3 times in a row.

Each of these people has been 'thanked' on every posting by gratefulforhelp.

gratefulforhelp has been 'thanked' over 59 THOUSAND times in less than 5 thousand posts.

Is this a CONSPIRACY???

What can it mean?

It means that you still have to pay child support.