DLA Reform Consultation Started Today!

L6MCT

If you get, or are in the process of claiming, DLA then you really must read this consultation paper you can find it here:

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/dla-reform-consultation.pdf

The DLA Reform Consultation started today and runs until 14th February 2011.

They are talking about changing the name of DLA to Personal Independence Payment and having 2 levels for each component. They are also talking about taking into account the claimants use of aids and adaptations (including wheelchairs which are, apparently, ignored at present) into the assessment.

Qualifying period is to go up from 3 to 6 months:

Personal Independence Payment will only be available to those with a long-term health condition or impairment. We propose that to qualify an individual must have met the eligibility criteria for a period of six months (the ‘Qualifying Period’) and be expected to continue to satisfy the entitlement conditions for at least a further six months (the ‘Prospective Test’). This means that, to be eligible for the benefit, an individual’s health condition or impairment must be expected to last a minimum of 12 months.

It also says that an important part of the new process is "likely to be a face-to-face discussion with a healthcare professional" - which I am sure is Con-dem speak for ATOS!

They are looking for responses to the following questions:

1. What are the problems or barriers that prevent disabled people participating in society and leading independent, full and active lives?

2. Is there anything else about Disability Living Allowance (DLA) that should stay the same?

3. What are the main extra costs that disabled people face?

4. The new benefit will have two rates for each component:

•   Will having two rates per component make the benefit easier to understand and administer, while ensuring appropriate levels of support?

•   What, if any, disadvantages or problems could having two rates per component cause?

5. Should some health conditions or impairments mean an automatic entitlement to the benefit, or should all claims be based on the needs and circumstances of the individual applying?

6. How do we prioritise support to those people least able to live full and active lives? Which activities are most essential for everyday life?

7. How can we best ensure that the new assessment appropriately takes account of variable and fluctuating conditions?

8. Should the assessment of a disabled person’s ability take into account any aids and adaptations they use?

• What aids and adaptations should be included?

• Should the assessment only take into account aids and adaptations where the person already has them or should we consider those that the person might be eligible for and can easily obtain?

9. How could we improve the process of applying for the benefit for individuals and make it a more positive experience? For example:

• How could we make the claim form easier to fill in?
• How can we improve information about the new benefit so that people are clear about what it is for and who is likely to qualify?

10. What supporting evidence will help provide a clear assessment of ability and who is best placed to provide this?

11. An important part of the new process is likely to be a face-to-face discussion with a healthcare professional.

• What benefits or difficulties might this bring?
• Are there any circumstances in which it may be inappropriate to require a face-to-face meeting with a healthcare professional – either in an individual’s own home or another location?

12. How should the reviews be carried out? For example:

• What evidence and/or criteria should be used to set the frequency of reviews?

• Should there be different types of review depending on the needs of the individual and their impairment/condition?

13. The system for Personal Independence Payment will be easier for individuals to understand, so we expect people to be able to identify and report changes in their needs. However, we know that some people do not currently keep the Department informed. How can we encourage people to report changes in circumstances?

14. What types of advice and information are people applying for Personal Independence Payment likely to need and would it be helpful to provide this as part of the benefit claiming process?

15. Could some form of requirement to access advice and support, where appropriate, help encourage the minority of claimants who might otherwise not take action? If so, what would be the key features of such a system, and what would need to be avoided?

16. How do disabled people currently fund their aids and adaptations? Should there be an option to use Personal Independence Payment to meet a one-off cost?

17. What are the key differences that we should take into account when assessing children?

18. How important or useful has DLA been at getting disabled people access to other services or entitlements? Are there things we can do to improve these passporting arrangements?

19. What would be the implications for disabled people and service providers if it was not possible for Personal Independence Payment to be used as a passport to other benefits and services?

20. What different assessments for disability benefits or services could be combined and what information about the disabled person could be shared to minimise bureaucracy and duplication?

21. What impact could our proposals have on the different equality groups (our initial assessment of which is on page 28) and what else should be considered in developing the policy?

22. Is there anything else you would like to tell us about the proposals in this public consultation?

vision2009

You can tell these muppets what you think in this document:
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/dla-reform-consultation-easyread.pdf
More "moving the goalposts"
What an evil regime we are ruled by.

lyniced

I have FA and am in a wheelchair fulltime (I'm never going to get better as there is no cure). I think I meet all the critrea

Indie_Kid

3. What are the main extra costs that disabled people face?

The problem with this question, is that the answers will be different for everyone. I have multiple disabilities and my costs will be different to someone with one of my disabilities.

I already meet the criteria - have been disabled since at least 5 months old. Currently, all my disabilities are incurable and are likely to either stay the same or get worse the older I get.

8. Should the assessment of a disabled person’s ability take into account any aids and adaptations they use?

They already do this. For most (if not, all) questions on the form, it asks "what aids and adaptations do you use?" And then there's something about whether someone helps you use them.

I was actually told that if I use the equipment I have, I wouldn't need help. Er, if it worked, I wouldn't be on the partially sighted register.

Jo_King

Thanks for posting this. I'm going to reply.

I have two main issues. One is with ATOS - twice now I've had drs say I can perform actions - but not include how much pain I was in while doing them. If I can carry a bag, but be in so much pain that I'm in tears, why is that considered relevant.

Secondly, I would like some consideration for keeping people in work. I've been turned down for DLA twice now (I'm in the process of appeal). I want to keep working. I know access to work exists, but it's the ongoing costs. For me, I need physio once a fortnight. It keeps my pain under control so I can manage a day at work. Trying to manage personal care AND go to work leaves me in tears of frustration, and is gradually making me iller (my GP and consultant agree on this). I want to work, but right now the balance of costs means that, once I've paid for the costs of managing my illnesses, I've got less that the minimum wage to live on. So, perhaps, there should be some consideration of the ongoing costs for a person with a disability trying to stay in work.

Indie_Kid

Jo_King wrote: »

Thanks for posting this. I'm going to reply.

I have two main issues. One is with ATOS - twice now I've had drs say I can perform actions - but not include how much pain I was in while doing them. If I can carry a bag, but be in so much pain that I'm in tears, why is that considered relevant.

Could you carry out these tasks if asked every day?

So, perhaps, there should be some consideration of the ongoing costs for a person with a disability trying to stay in work.

Disabled persons' working tax credit?

Jo_King

sh1305 wrote: »

Could you carry out these tasks if asked every day?

No - I can do it - if the house was on fire say - but otherwise doing it means I will be incapacitated for the rest of the day. If I do it today, I couldn't do it tomorrow.

sh1305 wrote: »

Disabled persons' working tax credit?

Only if you get DLA - which I'm still battling to get. THe ATOS report has made me so angry - the dr says I don't have a heart condition - even though he was holding a letter from a consultant explaining it. I'm hugely frustrated that an ATOS dr can directly contradict a hospital consultant, and it's the ATOS dr who's believed.

Indie_Kid

Jo_King wrote: »

No - I can do it - if the house was on fire say - but otherwise doing it means I will be incapacitated for the rest of the day. If I do it today, I couldn't do it tomorrow.

It's reasonable to suggest that you can't it then, I think.

jonnypb

If you are entitled to the higher rate motability under the current dla scheme will you automatically still get it under the PIP scheme?

Indie_Kid

jonnypb wrote: »

If you are entitled to the higher rate motability under the current dla scheme will you automatically still get it under the PIP scheme?

I think they said that if you can mobilise via a wheelchair, you're not entitled, or won't be rather.

oldestrocker

To be honest this review has been long overdue. DLA has become a National scandal as viewed by the majority of the British people.
It has been abused and used for far too long as an 'extra top up' of income as well as a key to open other doors!

I am sure that nearly everyone knows or knows of someone that is claiming this benefit illegally. Be it that the claim was exagerated or it was genuine in time gone by but is still being claimed despite an improvement in health that has not been notified.

And before you say that I don't know what I am talking about - I do, I suffer from a progressive disease myself.

This is going to be the first audit of every claimant to ensure that those who are claiming it are genuinely entitled to it.
It should be tightened, the conditions should be made more difficult, AND it should be re-tested every 12 months. One simple way of getting rid of the 'bogus' claims.

Like ESA, it was expected to show approx 25% of false claims - in fact that figure went up to close on 75%.
They expect DLA also to be approx 25%, but who knows - it wouldn't surprise me to find that the failure rate will also hit 70%+.

You know who to blame for this review - not the government - but the ones that have made a laughing stock out of this benefit!!

I welcome the changes and for once we will see some honesty creeping into the benefit system as we are seeing happening to ESA!!!!