We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
A thread not often seen in these parts!
Stigy
Posts: 1,581 Forumite
Since I joined these Forums I've noticed a clear disregard for certain rules relating Penalty Charge Notices for parking on privately managed land or property. I think company's should posses more legal power in order to enforce such notices. Why should people think they can park for free just because a parking ticket isn't worth the paper it's written on? I pay for my parking because I respect the fact that company's need to make an income. I don't have to like certain revenue making antics, but it's the same in all areas of business!
I work for a well known Train Operating Company (TOC) and part of my remit is parking enforcement. Now although some TOCs don't extend their byelaws to their car parks (I would imagine this is as the car park is leased to the TOC or Network rail, thus making byelaws not applicable), the TOC I work for is covered by the National Railways Byelaws, and as such, any person found to be in breach of these byelaws can potentially be summonsed to court and prosecuted. Logistically it's unfeasable to report all parking contraventions, due to needing to question the offender (most people leave their cars at railway stations all day whilst they go to work).
The only reason I can see why a PCN can't be changed in to a possible report for prosecution (as a Penalty Fare would do if unpaid), is that the parking is managed by another company, and the TOC I work for doesn't deal with this 'in-house' so to speak. Also, ideally to support a prosecution the reporting officer would need to interview the driver when he/she returns to his/her vehicle.
Although a bit of a rant, it's a well justified one I believe!
I work for a well known Train Operating Company (TOC) and part of my remit is parking enforcement. Now although some TOCs don't extend their byelaws to their car parks (I would imagine this is as the car park is leased to the TOC or Network rail, thus making byelaws not applicable), the TOC I work for is covered by the National Railways Byelaws, and as such, any person found to be in breach of these byelaws can potentially be summonsed to court and prosecuted. Logistically it's unfeasable to report all parking contraventions, due to needing to question the offender (most people leave their cars at railway stations all day whilst they go to work).
The only reason I can see why a PCN can't be changed in to a possible report for prosecution (as a Penalty Fare would do if unpaid), is that the parking is managed by another company, and the TOC I work for doesn't deal with this 'in-house' so to speak. Also, ideally to support a prosecution the reporting officer would need to interview the driver when he/she returns to his/her vehicle.
Although a bit of a rant, it's a well justified one I believe!
0
Comments
-
You feel it is OK for private companies to misrepresent the law in order to make a profit?
You feel it is OK for private companies to bully and harrass?
You feel it is OK for private companies to effectively steal cars through clamping?0 -
You feel it is OK for private companies to misrepresent the law in order to make a profit?
You feel it is OK for private companies to bully and harrass?
You feel it is OK for private companies to effectively steal cars through clamping?
You feel it is ok to trespass on someone else's land?0 -
So paying 50p an hour in order to park is unreasonable? I agree that some daily charges are a bit inflated, but we all have to pay our way! You could say the same for any way any comapny makes their money. People will generally take the !!!!.You feel it is OK for private companies to misrepresent the law in order to make a profit?
You feel it is OK for private companies to bully and harrass?
You feel it is OK for private companies to effectively steal cars through clamping?
If somebody parked on your driveway day in, day out, you'd become annoyed and request the Police remove said vehicle, surely? What is the difference in private company's managing their car parks?
As for bullying, well if we all abided by the rules/byelaws set down, nobody would have that perception, would they?
Clamping? Yes, I agree wholeheartedly!0 -
I think you will find, if you look deep enough, that no-one on here would recommend trying to park for free when a charge is levied. What we all do dislike and fight against are the made up rules these ppc's come up with to fleece those that have correctly paid.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
As you see we agree with your first paragraph.So paying 50p an hour in order to park is unreasonable? I agree that some daily charges are a bit inflated, but we all have to pay our way! You could say the same for any way any comapny makes their money. People will generally take the !!!!.
If somebody parked on your driveway day in, day out, you'd become annoyed and request the Police remove said vehicle, surely?
As for bullying, well if we all abided by the rules set down, nobody would have that perception, would they?
Clamping? Yes, I agree wholeheartedly!
As for the second, I have yet to hear of anyone doing this and however there is legal redress available.
If the rules were fair and fairly applied then most people would have no problem with them. There's a world of difference between persuading someone to pay and using underhand and bullying tactics to say nothing about downright illegal and threatening ones.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
I'm pretty sure Parking attendants aren't mind readers though, and a hidden parking ticket isn't "clearly displayed"....Somebody WITH a correct ticket that has taken up two parking spaces through their own mindless and selfish parking, deserves a PCN in my opinion. And those who take up a disabled bay without displaying a blue badge deserve a PCN, even if it emerges that they just didn't display said badge!peter_the_piper wrote: »I think you will find, if you look deep enough, that no-one on here would recommend trying to park for free when a charge is levied. What we all do dislike and fight against are the made up rules these ppc's come up with to fleece those that have correctly paid.0 -
Yes, to a point I agree. However if the ticket is shown to have fallen then it would be reasonable to cancel as no infraction has occurred. When someone fully covers two bay then its selfish, when they have a wheel barely on the line and get a ticket thats taking the p***. Blue badge infringements same as fallen ticket.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Where I respect what you're saying, and fully agree about the two bays thing, as far as fallen tickets go, it's hard enough to find a ticket somebody has placed in their car sometimes, let alone see a ticket that's upside down, on the floor! Regarding the spaces issue again, it's often hard to fathom whether the car you are looking at actually started the "trend" anyway, unless all spaces next to it are full.peter_the_piper wrote: »Yes, to a point I agree. However if the ticket is shown to have fallen then it would be reasonable to cancel as no infraction has occurred. When someone fully covers two bay then its selfish, when they have a wheel barely on the line and get a ticket thats taking the p***. Blue badge infringements same as fallen ticket.
Reagrding blue badges, the company who manage our car parks do actually use warnings for undisplayed blue badges, tickets bearly visible or out of date season tickets as a matter of coutesy, then, if you see the same car offending again, it's fair game (monthly or above season tickets have 7-days grace as a matter of courtesy, if they're out of date).0 -
Don't think anyone on here endorses not paying to park, I think the landowner has a right to make a charge for parking, and I always pay if I need too, what people advise is not to pay a private company a penalty charge which is not legal.
And clamping will become illegal very soon.Excel Parking, MET Parking, Combined Parking Solutions, VP Parking Solutions, ANPR PC Ltd, & Roxburghe Debt Collectors. What do they all have in common?
They are all or have been suspended from accessing the DVLA database for gross misconduct!
Do you really need to ask what kind of people run parking companies?0 -
The solution to the tickets problem is either a glue that Actually Does work or to have a clip inside the windscreen to hold the ticket. Problem solved.
As you use a ppc to issue tickets then its most unlikely they have the authority to issue under rail bylaws unless the rail company actually runs the parking and just subcontracts the issuing. PPC's cannot use byelaw 14 for their own benefit, all these go to mags court.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards