Warning - apcoa - must see

geordieracer

Messrs_Arthur_and_Terry wrote: »

Example Case: Oldham County Court heard the case of Combined Parking Solutions (CPS) versus Stephen Thomas, of Chadwick Street.

k.

Which we all think is the only time that a PPC has won a case - and even then we think it was a stooge case...

Now again this thread goes back to whether a PPc has issued a ticket or whether it is an issue under the bylaw.

and again im a person who works in the industry and can confirm that if a PPc issues a ticket under the bylaw its not enforceable.Due to the nature of the bylaws this is not possible.

now away with you

Coupon-mad

Messrs_Arthur_and_Terry wrote: »

My interest is only to advise members to caution. We are all aware of the internet experts who have a friend who is a top legal counsel. The advice is inavraibly skewed to the damages argument, contract law, statute, precedence, etc.

So that's your only interest is it Peter?! I think you have a MUCH more vested interest.

Here's some legal advice from a few people who actually know the score, unlike sad teaboys at UKCPS throwing their toys out of the pram:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/sep/04/parking-ticket-private-property

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAIcdi9niHA

and

Judge quashes 'fine'

and

Parking Eye ordered by judge to refund fake fine

Oh and you know your bedtime reading, that precious BPA Code of Practice? Well we all know what the BPA Chief Exec admitted to Parliament about fake PCNs don't we:

Feb 2010 Patrick Troy goes crying to Parliament that PPC tickets not enforceable

and he met with Lynn Featherstone after the clamping ban in the summer and admitted again that PPC tickets can be ignored!

Messrs_Arthur_and_Terry

So what you guys are saying, is that no respondents are having court orders applied against them? No one is being pinged by the magistrates?

I thought the basic tenet and advice was to ignore demands. I previously suggested that to ignore them was perilous. It seems to me that many of those who have ignored the demands have wound up in court as I previously suggested, many have been made to pay penalty fees, spent money on attending court and probably lost wages too.

Just looking at CFS' site alone they list out numerous cases in their favour. I would guess they have been paid?

It's seems to me the only way we are going to sought this, is for the forum members who dispute the process to deliberately flout the signs, get a demand and let us know how they got along once it hit court. Three MoneySavingExpert test cases should be enough?

dacouch

Magistrates do not judge private parking tickets

BLT_2

sassy-one wrote: »

Guys, I have been in touch again earlier this morning with Site Admin.

I have brought to there attention a number of issues I personally have with this thread and 'one or two' certain users posting attempting to disrupt this thread.

This thread will remain active, until such a time I feel it becomes necessary to close this thread, arguing or alike will not cause me to have this thread closed, so any attempt to do such will fail.

You really have nothing better to do?

taffy056

Messrs_Arthur_and_Terry wrote: »

Just looking at CFS' site alone they list out numerous cases in their favour. I would guess they have been paid?

Of course they do, all these people taken to court, losing then refusing to pay what the judge says within 30 days, they are all putting something on their credit files for 6 years for a £150 or so!

Or its a pack of lies dreamed up to intimidate people to pay these tickets, when its quite plainly a penalty, and would not hold up in the small claims, something euro have gone on record to say they have NEVER taken anyone there!

And finally its CPS who have said what you mention without any verifible proof!

peter_the_piper

""Just looking at CFS' site alone they list out numerous cases in their favour. I would guess they have been paid?""

So if I were to put some claims on my website that I had beaten ppc's and got ccj's against a lot of them, you would believe me of course.

esmerobbo

CPS last case won case was June 09 before that October 08. I would suggest that defences at that time would have not been as strong as they would be now. There are 3 transcripts posted on that site and the defences were very poor.

Peter Haswell keeps popping up under many usernames with so called won CCJ and even goes on to list them. He even had 5 against premiership footballers.

A list of CCJs is just that. Anyone could make a factual list or imaginary. Come on if your case is so strong post up some transcripts!

backfoot

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Messrs Arthur and Terry are not Murdo Maguire, his posts were good IMHO!

The former is clearly a PPC employee, I believe it's Peter Haswell the office teaboy at UKCPS but if I am wrong I am sure he/she will correct me when he can tear himself away from reading fictional Codes of Practice.

Yes. I think you are right. I knew it was a sockpuppet but which one.

The trouble with sockpuppets is that they quickly reveal their true colours. So if it's Peter Haswell ,we really have got him rattled. First, Peternet, the aptly named Peter 'tit' and now the scamsters Arthur and Terry.

Unfortunately for him,his interventions only provide more and more evidence that his empire is crumbling and he don't like it ! :rotfl:

As I said before it was removed,sockpuppets the increasing sign of desperation eh Peter ?

backfoot

Messrs_Arthur_and_Terry wrote: »

It's seems to me the only way we are going to sought this, is for the forum members who dispute the process to deliberately flout the signs, get a demand and let us know how they got along once it hit court. Three MoneySavingExpert test cases should be enough?

I am happy to be number one. It's a genuine case and look forward with glee to it coming to court.

I will report back unless you want a personal invite to the hearing.

btw.it's sort not sought. Not going to get to Director level with this sort of faux pas. :rotfl: