Parking Eye Fine

smithy2121

I have been on there but it all seems to be about Parking fines from the Goverment rather than once from PPC's. I will try them and see what I get. Thanks for believing me this time, I was a little taken aback when I just came back on the site to be called many things that are unfair and untrue. I wonder if I could receive an apology from these people even if it is in private?

Thanks.

halibut2209

So in your first post, you said you HAD a CCJ, then in your second post you said you hadn't

hmm.....

peter_the_piper

First thing to do today is to phone the court to check if the claim is genuine or just one of the very underhand tricks they try to get you to pay. Its not unknown for them to photocopy a real set of papers to send to you without actually going as far as registering it. Still get onto pepipoo, they are not just about legal tickets and will give very good advice if a post gives all the facts.

I see you have now started you own thread, good, lets now wait for Lil needles to post again on here.

Coupon-mad

smithy2121 wrote: »

I have been on there but it all seems to be about Parking fines from the Government

Really?

Were you just looking at the homepage or the speeding fines area, rather than the Parking forum itself? You need the Parking forum, click here for some results about Parking eye on pepipoo:

Let me Google that for you

You need the pepipoo Parking forum - but they may not believe you either (I don't yet!):

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=30

smithy2121 wrote: »

Thanks for believing me this time, I was a little taken aback when I just came back on the site to be called many things that are unfair and untrue. I wonder if I could receive an apology from these people even if it is in private?
Thanks.

As I said, I don't believe you because it's unheard of and the way you post is odd. You asked for this to be put on the forums:

'Please put this in every forum to get rid of the myth that this company do not take people to court!!'

That was a PPC posting if ever I read one - not a worried newbie.

Please convince me you are not a PPC stooge or a wind-up, show the papers on pepipoo.com and then - if a Court case ever happens - let's see you defend it properly.

halibut2209

I think they are starting to see the light over there as well

Sirdan

halibut2209 wrote: »

I think they are starting to see the light over there as well

Yep -I got told off by a Mod for my "doctored" MCOL image ..but it seems to have sunk in finally .

Court fee is £15 my a**e !

taffy056

It's a funny thing, but I have seen an attachment of court papers with a £15 fee on here in the last few days, and the same question raised, still I got to say it, something doesn't ring true with this , halibut and I have a wager on it lol

Sirdan

taffy056 wrote: »

It's a funny thing, but I have seen an attachment of court papers with a £15 fee on here in the last few days, and the same question raised, still I got to say it, something doesn't ring true with this , halibut and I have a wager on it lol

Very odd just been thru MCOL ..started a claim (fake not going to actually submit it ) BUT when you put in the amount of the claim it calculates the court fee for you .

Guess what my claim of £300.01 generated a fee of .........yep £35 !!

HO87

taffy056 wrote: »

It's a funny thing, but I have seen an attachment of court papers with a £15 fee on here in the last few days, and the same question raised, still I got to say it, something doesn't ring true with this , halibut and I have a wager on it lol

I think this may have been from papers produced (and posted here IIRC) by a well known solicitor/debt collector (or is it debt collector/solicitor as it really isn't clear whether they know what they are) where, besides anything else, it was reasonably apparent from the sums claimed that the author of the document hadn't drawn up a claim for some considerable time and had used the pretty old issue fee of £15.

Sirdan

HO87 wrote: »

I think this may have been from papers produced (and posted here IIRC) by a well known solicitor/debt collector (or is it debt collector/solicitor as it really isn't clear whether they know what they are) where, besides anything else, it was reasonably apparent from the sums claimed that the author of the document hadn't drawn up a claim for some considerable time and had used the pretty old issue fee of £15.

Maybe so but how do we explain an alleged 2011 claim produced using MCOL generating an incorrect fee of £15 ???