We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tent thread
Options
Comments
-
princeofpounds wrote: »Was this the case where the woman harrassed and potentially illegally evicted her tenant through the media, calling her a squatter and generally acting obnoxiously and ignorantly?
Certainly was indeed.
What is this website for if it is not about CONSUMER REVENGE
For heavens sake what a joke.:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
Maybe it was to do with the amount of personal info that was on the thread. Although it's not as though 'She Who Must Not Be Named' could really complain about invasion of privacy... An explanation would be nice though.0
-
The only personal information that was on the thread was that which the landlord had already put out on national television - including an view of the contract with both her and the tenant's contact numbers.Maybe it was to do with the amount of personal info that was on the thread. Although it's not as though 'She Who Must Not Be Named' could really complain about invasion of privacy... An explanation would be nice though.
Anyway, the thread is still available via Google's cache, at least for the moment:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amoneysavingexpert.com+%22suzy+butler%22poppy100 -
I think the legal action is certainly a possibility.
The thread has had personal details on there for a week and we know from the FB page that they have been reading for a few days so it seems unlikely they would only rremove it now.
Nothing on that thread was not already public domain information.0 -
The only personal information that was on the thread was that which the landlord had already put out on national television - including an view of the contract with both her and the tenant's contact numbers.
Anyway, the thread is still available via Google's cache, at least for the moment:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amoneysavingexpert.com+%22suzy+butler%22
As a data controller she should have been investigated for this then shouldnt she.
Sharing tenants phone numbers via the web.
For crying out loud.:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
The only personal information that was on the thread was that which the landlord had already put out on national television - including an image of the contract with both her and the tenant's contact numbers.
Anyway, the thread is still available via Google's cache, at least for the moment:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amoneysavingexpert.com+%22suzy+butler%22
Exactly! That's why it seems bizarre that MSE could face any legal challenges for displaying something which is in the public domain anyway - and was put there by the person that was being criticised in the thread.
Has GMTV et al been asked to remove the video clips on their website? Are the You Tube clips still available?
That thread was one of a very few offering a dissenting voice to the outrageously ill informed views of the internet lynch mobs' & media frenzy witchhunt.0 -
mynameisdave wrote: »I think the legal action is certainly a possibility.
The thread has had personal details on there for a week and we know from the FB page that they have been reading for a few days so it seems unlikely they would only rremove it now.
Nothing on that thread was not already public domain information.
I guess so, (I'm assuming you mean legal action between tnt and LL, not LL & MSE) but I'm not sure how the thread could have jeopardised tnt's case.0 -
I guess so, (I'm assuming you mean legal action between tnt and LL, not LL & MSE) but I'm not sure how the thread could have jeopardised tnt's case.
Yeah, between T and LL.Has GMTV et al been asked to remove the video clips on their website? Are the You Tube clips still available?
GMTV clip still available.0 -
The video clips (and other material) is still available vis the FB pages. Fortunately, FB are a bit sturdier in their defence of free expression than some websites.0
-
GMTV may have complained?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards