We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

'Policing benefit bashing in the forum: valid debate or hate crime?' blog discussion

Options
178101213

Comments

  • JDPower
    JDPower Posts: 1,689 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    BLT wrote: »
    Clearly I missed your point here :-)
    You just had a long rant about everything you hate about the forum and the then tell people if they don't like it, turn it off. You don't see the irony?
  • Nope. It attempted to open Outlook Express which I don't use.

    I dont think the system Edinburghlass described is open to all users yet, though i may be wrong, not visited the thread regarding it for a week or two, though i can vouch she is correct for those trialing it, as i have used it, and even though i do use outlook, its a vast improvemant, so hpoe they make it available to all, but i think that will depend on the load it puts on the servers if i understood the reason for the trial correctly
  • poet123
    poet123 Posts: 24,099 Forumite
    Yes, I think it is initially for long standing members, it suits me much better (not that I an given to reporting) as I dont like/use OE.
  • poet123 wrote: »
    Yes, I think it is initially for long standing members, it suits me much better (not that I an given to reporting) as I dont like/use OE.


    Dam, if thats the case ive been sussed by the forum team :p:rotfl:
  • poet123
    poet123 Posts: 24,099 Forumite
    Dam, if thats the case ive been sussed by the forum team :p:rotfl:

    They used those words in the post relatiing to the new system.....so, have you been here before?;););)
  • Kronkston_2
    Kronkston_2 Posts: 4,037 Forumite
    edited 7 August 2010 at 8:19PM
    How can anyone suggesting starving vulnerable people to death not be deemed offensive?
  • poet123 wrote: »
    They used those words in the post relatiing to the new system.....so, have you been here before?;););)
    oooops :o:rotfl: :silenced:

    (though i dont hide it, see sig;):p)
  • bat-out-of-hell
    bat-out-of-hell Posts: 480 Forumite
    edited 7 August 2010 at 6:14PM
    Kronkston wrote: »
    How can anyone suggesting staving vulnerable people to death not be deemed offensive?

    It can not be, but i am sure someone will disagree icon_rolleyes1.gif
  • Kronkston_2
    Kronkston_2 Posts: 4,037 Forumite
    It can not be, but i am sure someone will disagree icon_rolleyes1.gif

    Yes Martin for one.
  • Kronkston_2
    Kronkston_2 Posts: 4,037 Forumite
    What the hell are our troops doing in Afghanistan is we tolerating calls to starve to death our sick and disabled back in the UK?

    Is that what we fought two world wars for?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.