We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Forwarding mail

Options
1235

Comments

  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    What 'situation' might that be custardy?

    Why would going home to my parents be a 'cushy' option? As bizarre as you might find this I actually enjoy going to visit my parents so why on earth would I want to 'cut the apron strings' as you put it???

    the situation that makes you 'need' mail redirected
    staying with your parents is a choice then
    so keep a flat while you are at home
  • Bogof_Babe
    Bogof_Babe Posts: 10,803 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »
    not really.RTS items are not all handled the same way
    many items are destroyed

    How is someone supposed to stop the onslaught of delivered mail for someone who no longer lives at the address, if RTS mail marked "gone away" is destroyed rather than sent back to the originator?

    I was bombarded with mailshots from a well known catalogue company for the previous owner of my flat. After the first couple of months (when I redirected it) I started RTSing it. Couldn't understand why it kept on coming.

    Eventually I had to write to the previous occupant pleading with them to get this mail stopped, and touch wood it seems to have worked. However if the RTS items had actually gone back to the company I don't think I'd have had to put up with over a year of aggro.

    What criteria determine which RTS items are destroyed?
    :D I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe :D

  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Bogof_Babe wrote: »
    How is someone supposed to stop the onslaught of delivered mail for someone who no longer lives at the address, if RTS mail marked "gone away" is destroyed rather than sent back to the originator?

    I was bombarded with mailshots from a well known catalogue company for the previous owner of my flat. After the first couple of months (when I redirected it) I started RTSing it. Couldn't understand why it kept on coming.

    Eventually I had to write to the previous occupant pleading with them to get this mail stopped, and touch wood it seems to have worked. However if the RTS items had actually gone back to the company I don't think I'd have had to put up with over a year of aggro.

    What criteria determine which RTS items are destroyed?

    its complicated and depends on delivery method used,whether it has a return address etc
    many companies wont stop sending letters until they have another address to send to for a recipient
  • mazza111
    mazza111 Posts: 6,327 Forumite
    If there's a RTS address it gets returned. Other than that it depends on the way it's been sent on what happens to it.
    4 Stones and 0 pounds or 25.4kg lighter :j
  • Spoke to my delivery office today who said that they do endeavour to deliver forwarded mail, but the reason they had charged me for mine was because it hadn't originally been sent by Royal Mail.

    It all makes sense now!! Thanks for all the comments!
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Spoke to my delivery office today who said that they do endeavour to deliver forwarded mail, but the reason they had charged me for mine was because it hadn't originally been sent by Royal Mail.

    It all makes sense now!! Thanks for all the comments!

    do they mean it was delivered via courier or downstream access mail?
  • custardy wrote: »
    do they mean it was delivered via courier or downstream access mail?

    Presumably downstream access mail.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Presumably downstream access mail.

    and theres a direct violation of RM's licence
  • custardy wrote: »
    and theres a direct violation of RM's licence

    ??????????
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ??????????

    RM cannot favour their mail over a competitors mail
    so that office in penalising DSA mail is violating the terms of the licence
    its the same reason why RM's prices are regulated and for example when they offer free local collect at xmas they must get permission to do so
    (since competitors cant offer the same service)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.