Benefit threads a new board. Please could one of the mods read .

Morglin

Noz wrote: »

You would hate to be guilty of that eh Morglin?

Well, I don't think all those on benefits are ponces, I don't think all those with brown skins are terrorist/scroungers/illegals, nor do I think all those working are tax dodging ponces, no.:D

People are people - all different, and none of it reflected in what they do and what they earn/get.

Lin

Jomo

jamespir wrote: »

maybe but jsut because they dont look ill to you or i does not mean theyre arent actually ill

But if they are claiming for a bad back...I doubt they would be capable of doing such things....(roll eyes).

Wow

Sunshine12 wrote: »

If James doesnt want to be so anal as to check his posts 3 times then thats up to him.

So because someone with dyslexia decides to check their posts a few times for mistakes you seem to think its ok to call them anal??????

What a stupid thing to say.:eek:

kermitfrog

jamespir wrote: »

ive an iq of 148 thanks so i damn well know a lot more things than you

Some of the stupidest people I know have high IQs. They don't know anything much, although most of them know to keep their IQs to themselves.

They're clever enough to realise that if you wave your halo in the air, someone will shove it up your fundament.

Sunshine12

Wow wrote: »

So because someone with dyslexia decides to check their posts a few times for mistakes you seem to think its ok to call them anal??????

What a stupid thing to say.:eek:

Apologies if that caused offence. You have taken this out of the context in which it was meant and was not made because you are dyslexic. If I checked mine 3 times prior to posting I would call myself anal so in that context yes. You were having a go at James which IMO wasnt called for given that you should fully appreciate the constraints he may be under given his dyslexia. You spend most of your time having a go at him, whether in jest or not, and in this case I thought it was bang out of order.