We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Another reason to vote Tory...

mitchaa
mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
edited 29 March 2010 at 10:26AM in Debate House Prices & the Economy
Seems like a good idea to me...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8592144.stm

People will have more in their paypackets which gets the thumbs up from me :jIt would appear from the article that the additional 1% would be scrapped for basic rate taxpayers but still be applicable for higher rate.

In order to close the deficit, they really need to start looking at ways to reduce the benefits bill (Perhaps a child related cap or limit on tax credits)
«13456

Comments

  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
    Would also appear that he would raise the higher rate limit from £43,875 upto £45,400
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    mitchaa wrote: »
    People will have more in their paypackets which gets the thumbs up from me :jIt would appear from the article that the additional 1% would be scrapped for basic rate taxpayers but still be applicable for higher rate.

    I wonder how much of this is smoke.

    It's easy to announce an extra 1% and the perception is that therefore you have 1% more money to spend / save, however the reality is that other intriduction could easily wipe out that 1% and more.

    It very pheasable that you percieve you will have an extra 1% income, however other taxations would result in a net reduction in disposable income.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    Well, we know (do we?) that Tories plan to cut the deficit quickly (at least they said so a few weeks on and off?).

    So I would be looking at which other taxes will be rising to pay for this NI measure.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
  • robin_banks
    robin_banks Posts: 15,778 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Well, we know (do we?) that Tories plan to cut the deficit quickly (at least they said so a few weeks on and off?).

    So I would be looking at which other taxes will be rising to pay for this NI measure.

    Value Added springs to mind.
    "An arrogant and self-righteous Guardian reading tvv@t".

    !!!!!! is all that about?
  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite

    So I would be looking at which other taxes will be rising to pay for this NI measure.

    Labour plans have not been introduced yet. The conservatives idea is to tax higher rate tax payers at 2% NIC rather than 1% so they are still going to generate 'extra' income, just not as much as labour had planned.
  • Election bribe pure and simple anything any of the parties say should taken with a pinch of salt.
    Normality will not resume until after the election when the government whether blue or red will hit us with everything but the kitchen sink to get the countries finances in order:eek:
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    mitchaa wrote: »
    Labour plans have not been introduced yet. The conservatives idea is to tax higher rate tax payers at 2% NIC rather than 1% so they are still going to generate 'extra' income, just not as much as labour had planned.

    I have been out of the UK on business for the last week, so I am not 100% informed on the budget etc yet.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
    Election bribe pure and simple anything any of the parties say should taken with a pinch of salt.
    Normality will not resume until after the election when the government whether blue or red will hit us with everything but the kitchen sink to get the countries finances in order:eek:

    It's bribed me;)

    Although to be fair I was always a tory man in the first place.
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    Your use of the word "another" implies that this is not an isolated reason.

    FWIW, this is not a reason. The notion that there are other reasons is:

    a) a joke

    b) countered by the tellingly obvious lack of ability within tory ranks to put forward a coherent set of individuals who would form a proper government
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • kennyboy66_2
    kennyboy66_2 Posts: 2,598 Forumite
    mitchaa wrote: »
    Seems like a good idea to me...

    People will have more in their paypackets which gets the thumbs up from me :jIt would appear from the article that the additional 1% would be scrapped for basic rate taxpayers but still be applicable for higher rate.

    In order to close the deficit, they really need to start looking at ways to reduce the benefits bill (Perhaps a child related cap or limit on tax credits)

    So does, cutting income tax, petrol duties and alcohol taxes.

    Thatcher increased direct & indirect taxes in 1981. Only dreamers think the deficit will be solved without some contribution from higher taxes.

    Another moronic policy from Gideon. He really is a gimp.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.