We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Answer: "5 more years of Gordon Brown"

191011121315»

Comments

  • nickmason
    nickmason Posts: 848 Forumite

    The whole stinking labour corrupt rich boy brigade know as much about going down t'pit as Cameron does.

    The Conservative chief whip is in fact an ex-miner.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    The NHS is important; but we could scale it back and survive. Education is important but cutting back won't create a generation of imbeciles.

    No, my question is this. What new growth areas have Labour come up with in the last 13 years. Areas where UK excels, and areas where SIGNIFICANT numbers of our future generation can work in.

    Erm, nothing. I suspect they know this, and they don't have a !!!!!!! clue how to solve the problem. Hence the use of state employment on a massive scale as a sticking plaster.

    Sadly, I am not sure the Tories have any better ideas. This doesn't say much about the lot of 'em.
  • nickmason
    nickmason Posts: 848 Forumite
    kabayiri wrote: »
    The NHS is important; but we could scale it back and survive. Education is important but cutting back won't create a generation of imbeciles.

    No, my question is this. What new growth areas have Labour come up with in the last 13 years. Areas where UK excels, and areas where SIGNIFICANT numbers of our future generation can work in.

    Erm, nothing. I suspect they know this, and they don't have a !!!!!!! clue how to solve the problem. Hence the use of state employment on a massive scale as a sticking plaster.

    Sadly, I am not sure the Tories have any better ideas. This doesn't say much about the lot of 'em.

    At Conservative Party Conference last year, James Dyson and Lord Baker, in outlining a plan "to get Britain working", talked of the paucity of innovation coming out of the UK (by comparison with Germany, China, even the Phillipines). They then compared the UK education system with Germany, where they maintain what we once had, and where now technical schools "outrank" the academic schools; hence the kudos in engineering and such like. In advocating a return to that tripartite educational system,they had the courage to admit that we had "got it wrong".

    Okay, so it's not a detailed blueprint, but I reckon it's a pretty good idea - and at the right level, rather than being micro-management.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.