Age 7 government child trust fund payments not being released!!!

Deepmistrust

Deepmistrust wrote: »

Second link down
"On Friday morning I opened a new account, made deposits of £300 and ended up with winnings of around £300."

Isn't Friday WTC in the bank day for you?

4th link down, this one is really funny:
"Hi,
I was playing on a site yesterday and can't remember which site it was?!"

Hahaha, there are so many he can't even remember which one he's given his child benefit to.:rotfl:

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

If you had of been around MSE for a bit longer, you would have known how lucrative it was to sign up to gambling sites for the "free" no deposit offers.

I made quite a bit out of this.

Again another idiotic attempt to take something out of context.

HAHAHA,
Classic excuse.

I think you may have taken it to the extreme Liam It ceases being lucrative when you spend your working day signing up and sending them all your money.;)

liam8282

Was my description of yourself a little too close for comfort?

Hence the need to bring up posts ranging from around 1 to 2 years old, surprisingly enough the time when you could get the "free" no deposit bonuses.

liam8282

"But then I'm not going around slagging people off who have issues with their Interest payments whilst simunltanously trying to reduce my own! That's the difference, in what makes you a hypocrit and me not.
Though it's quite funny that you found that relevant."

What is hypocritical is that you abuse somebody for seeking more information on a subject as I did, yet you do the same yourself.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

"But then I'm not going around slagging people off who have issues with their Interest payments whilst simunltanously trying to reduce my own! That's the difference, in what makes you a hypocrit and me not.
Though it's quite funny that you found that relevant."

What is hypocritical is that you abuse somebody for seeking more information on a subject as I did, yet you do the same yourself.

I'm not abusing you for seeking information on benefits you half-wit!!

I'm abusing you for the hypocrisy of slagging off others who seek information on benefits they might be entitled to, and then choose to work part time to overall inprove their financial and family position and label them as scroungers. Whislt simunltanously you also seek informations on benefits in order to REDUCE working hours to improve your own position. All the whilst benefitting from subsidised housing (that even many people working 16 hours do not benefit from) THAT is hypocrisy.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

Was my description of yourself a little too close for comfort?

Hence the need to bring up posts ranging from around 1 to 2 years old, surprisingly enough the time when you could get the "free" no deposit bonuses.

I clocked your posts the other day, but didn't think they were overly relevant at the time to the actual topic, but as you've done away with relevance to the topic, I thought why not?

Close for comfort? What that I'm sick of extortiante interest rates that CC' companies keep increasing, and sick of more and more of the payment goes on the interest rather than the balance Wow? LMAO, well spotted.

liam8282

They are not working, or maybe 16 hours per week to claim WTC, they are claiming all other possible benefits, living in a private rent (couldn't get a council house, hence the hostility toward me for being lucky enough to get one), they are probably a single person in their late 40s, early 50s, with no family, struggling to pay off their own debts on credit cards and loans (they have racked up buying plasma tvs, laptops etc.)

To elaborate further,

with their anarchist views, as demonstrated by their signature, they were probably in a minority group at school punk, goth, anarchist, they were probably bullied too. Which further explains the argumentative nature they now have.

I might add, Anarchist views which they uphold:

"Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society"

Until they realise that is the state that pays their benefits, so their anarchist views are all a bit confused, like all of the posts they have made on this thread.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

They are not working, or maybe 16 hours per week to claim WTC, they are claiming all other possible benefits, living in a private rent (couldn't get a council house, hence the hostility toward me for being lucky enough to get one), they are probably a single person in their late 40s, early 50s, with no family, struggling to pay off their own debts on credit cards and loans (they have racked up buying plasma tvs, laptops etc.)

To elaborate further,

with their anarchist views, as demonstrated by their signature, they were probably in a minority group at school punk, goth, anarchist, they were probably bullied too. Which further explains the argumentative nature they now have.

I might add, Anarchist views which they uphold:

"Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society"

Until they realise that is the state that pays their benefits, so their anarchist views are all a bit confused, like all of the posts they have made on this thread.

Hahaha, thats quite funny, seeing as the facts are:
You have anger issues against people that you perceive to be scroungers for working 16 hours per week and claiming WTC/CTC whilst simultanously:
Your partner reduced her hours, and you hoped to replace her income with benefits.
You gamble all the CTC on a myriad of online casino's (you can't even keep track to which one is which)
You got yourself into a position of "housing need" which afforded you subsidised housing to which you still benefit from today, even though you (your partner) voluntarily reduced her income safe in the knowledge the state is subsidicing your secured tenancy.

And, like most things, your knowledge of the principles of Anarchism is sincerely lacking. I assume you've never heard of the quote author either? In all seriousness, google him, you mind mind yourself a tad embarrassed.:rotfl:

EDIT: Cause of Liams anger issues? Perphaps a raging jealousy that despite benefitting from cheap housing, he wanted more money from the state to subsidice his partners choice to reduce her hours. Discovered he didnt get very much more, due to his own income (which he blows on gambling sites), and is in a raging fury at those people who ARE awarded more, as their household incomes are lower.

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

And, like most things, your knowledge of the principles of Anarchism is sincerely lacking. I assume you've never heard of the quote author either? In all seriousness, google him, you mind mind yourself a tad embarrassed.:rotfl:

Ok, I will provide the explanation to your own post, as you have difficulty understanding what you write, recurring theme here.

Avram Noam Chomsky........
......Since the 1960s, he has become known more widely as a political dissident and an anarchist.[8]


You have the definition of Anarchism above.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

Ok, I will provide the explanation to your own post, as you have difficulty understanding what you write, recurring theme here.

Avram Noam Chomsky........
......Since the 1960s, he has become known more widely as a political dissident and an anarchist.[8]


You have the definition of Anarchism above.

Well done on your knowledge of copying and pasting a wiki/google link.

Now back to the question: Do you actually know anything about Noam Chomsky? Or have you ever read or listened to anything he has written or said? Or do you have any idea about the level of respect the man has earned (regardless of whether you agree with him or not?).

Btw, I always find a one-line quick dictionary definition will not quite explain the full ideals behind the idea. Just thought if you want to have a conversation on the subject it might be better if you did a bit more googling (lol) on the subject.