Age 7 government child trust fund payments not being released!!!

POPPYOSCAR

"Hard work spotlights the character of people:some turn up their sleeves, some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all"

Sam Ewing

liam8282

Deepmistrust:

They are not working, or maybe 16 hours per week to claim WTC, they are claiming all other possible benefits, living in a private rent (couldn't get a council house, hence the hostility toward me for being lucky enough to get one), they are probably a single person in their late 40s, early 50s, with no family, struggling to pay off their own debts on credit cards and loans (they have racked up buying plasma tvs, laptops etc.)

To elaborate further,

with their anarchist views, as demonstrated by their signature, they were probably in a minority group at school punk, goth, anarchist, they were probably bullied too. Which further explains the argumentative nature they now have.

I might add, Anarchist views which they uphold:

"Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society"

Until they realise that is the state that pays their benefits, so their anarchist views are all a bit confused, like all of the posts they have made on this thread.

To elaborate even further,

There anarchist perspective gives them an outlet to vent their frustrations at the corporations, such as the credit card companies and banks he owes money too.

Using anarchist ideology, they can vent their fury at companies daring to want their money back with interest. But they freely ignored their own anarchist values when going to the companies in the first place, cap in hand, because they wanted the cash for the new 50" plasma. They freely signed up accepting the terms that those companies offered, regardless of their own values on anarchism.

They use their anarchist theories to support their arguments against the state and society that has treated them so badly, with their bullying at school, failure to get a council property, what they view as not getting enough cash for doing next to nothing.

Yet they brush them under the carpet every time their benefits are received.

Due to their erratic posting nature, I suspect they may also be currently suffering from stress or anxiety problems.

Probably because their only outlet are their argumentative posts on faceless internet forums. Maybe due to the fact they have no family or friends, probably because of their bitterness towards anyone who dare to have an opinion different to that of their own.

I also suspect that they may have a current or past, drink and / or drug problem. This again would explain a lot.

Another suspicion of my own, is that they are a short person, who wears glasses.

They also reject their own values such as anarchism when it appears that it would make a mockery of their own arguments.

It further questions their own morals.

Deepmistrust

"They also reject their own values such as anarchism when it appears that it would make a mockery of their own arguments."

"their own values" Still attributing the views of the author to me then?:rotfl: not quite keeping up deary.

And assuming I was an anarchist how would I be 'rejecting' anarchy in anything I have wrote, (bearing in mind the limitations of your knowledge of anarchism to defend your argument here), and why would it make a mockery?

I eagerly await.

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

"They also reject their own values such as anarchism when it appears that it would make a mockery of their own arguments."

"their own values" Still attributing the views of the author to me then?:rotfl: not quite keeping up deary.

And assuming I was an anarchist how would I be 'rejecting' anarchy in anything I have wrote, (bearing in mind the limitations of your knowledge of anarchism to defend your argument here), and why would it make a mockery?

I eagerly await.

Wait as long as you like.

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

"They also reject their own values such as anarchism when it appears that it would make a mockery of their own arguments."

"their own values" Still attributing the views of the author to me then?:rotfl: not quite keeping up deary.

And assuming I was an anarchist how would I be 'rejecting' anarchy in anything I have wrote, (bearing in mind the limitations of your knowledge of anarchism to defend your argument here), and why would it make a mockery?

I eagerly await.

??????????

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

Now you have something against kids with spots? I imagine you're a grown man, who hangs around outside secondary schools to call kids spotty?

Scary stuff.:eek:

No Iv'e got spotty teenagers of my own and I know what they are like!!!

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

Wait as long as you like.

Don't worry, I knew you couldn't do it :rotfl:

In all seriousness, I tend to find that before holding irrational hatred towards benefits recipients to do a basic bit of understanding where the hatred stems from.

Chomsky is very good at dispelling myths, you should give him a go.

Alternatively carry on doing what you are told, and keep directing your anger towards the poorest people in society, saves you having to think too much about anything

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

Don't worry, I knew you couldn't do it :rotfl:

In all seriousness, I tend to find that before holding irrational hatred towards benefits recipients to do a basic bit of understanding where the hatred stems from.

Chomsky is very good at dispelling myths, you should give him a go.

Alternatively carry on doing what you are told, and keep directing your anger towards the poorest people in society, saves you having to think too much about anything

??????????

Deepmistrust

POPPYOSCAR wrote: »

No Iv'e got spotty teenagers of my own and I know what they are like!!!

You know what teenagers with spots are like? Do they differ from teenagers without spots much?

Are your teenagers in their bedrooms on their laptops right now too? And do they know you use terms that describe them, as "insults" on the internet?

I'm kinda running with the idea that you don't actually think before typing?

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

You know what teenagers with spots are like? Do they differ from teenagers without spots much?

Are your teenagers in their bedrooms on their laptops right now too? And do they know you use terms that describe them, as "insults" on the internet?

I'm kinda running with the idea that you don't actually think before typing?

No they are too busy studying at school, which is where you should be right now.