We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Age 7 government child trust fund payments not being released!!!
Options
Comments
-
I will repeat "You have to first solve why the career claimants have enough to live on. Remember too that there are generations of families who have not worked. Once you solve this, you can then work out a better way forward - something everyone but yourself has made efforts to do."
If you ever get there, I will bother to answer you.:wave:0 -
Deepmistrust wrote: »You already consider £250 per month as "marginally". For people at the low end of the income spectrum (workers or non-workers) £250 per month is more than a marginally difference when it comes to expendable income (income after all rent and childcare has been factored).
It costs me more than that to run my car.
Which I wouldn't need if I was on benefits.
0 -
I will repeat "You have to first solve why the career claimants have enough to live on. Remember too that there are generations of families who have not worked. Once you solve this, you can then work out a better way forward - something everyone but yourself has made efforts to do."
If you ever get there, I will bother to answer you.:wave:
Ah, so like I said you can't actually get past the daily mail outrage stories, and just deal with the fact that job seekers (which is the current topic) mostly consist of people....seeking jobs?
I see, doing the "ner ner ner ner" routine instead.All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.0 -
It costs me more than that to run my car.
Which I wouldn't need if I was on benefits.
I'm sure you can afford a nice car, what with you living on a council estate. How did you manage that anyway?
:rotfl::rotfl:All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.0 -
Deepmistrust wrote: »I'm sure you can afford a nice car, what with you living on a council estate. How did you manage that anyway?
:rotfl::rotfl:
Again back to my personal circumstances.
Your own views of council estates are now becoming apparent too.0 -
Again back to my personal circumstances.
Your own views of council estates are now becoming apparent too.
Yes, that's right, I think council estates are cheap places to live.
Tell me, as you being the "I support my family" type, did you manage to be afforded social housing? Don't tell me...you were UNEMPLOYED LMAO.:rotfl:All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.0 -
Deepmistrust wrote: »Yes, that's right, I think council estates are cheap places to live.
Tell me, as you being the "I support my family" type, did you manage to be afforded social housing? Don't tell me...you were UNEMPLOYED LMAO.:rotfl:
Again, your assumptions. I have never been unemployed.
What is this fascination with me and my private life?
You are appearing more and more peculiar as this thread goes on.
Are you still keeping tally of how many times I use words like "rant", there is another to add. :rotfl:0 -
Deepmistrust wrote: »Yes, that's right, I think council estates are cheap places to live.
They are even cheaper for those that are on benefits and don't have to work to pay their own rent or council tax.0 -
Again, your assumptions. I have never been unemployed.
What is this fascination with me and my private life?
Fascination? LMAO, the idiot that spews his hatred for the fact the unemployed get benefits, whilst simultanously admitting he has been granted social housing, and that his own partner tried to replace earned income with benefits. hardly fascination, More like rubbernecking the hypocritical mess that is your life.
You are appearing more and more peculiar as this thread goes on.
Are you still keeping tally of how many times I use words like "rant", there is another to add. :rotfl:
You're now up to 98 times.:rotfl:All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.0 -
They are even cheaper for those that are on benefits and don't have to work to pay their own rent or council tax.
Which brings us back to why two supposedly working people were granted social housing, in this day and age. Come on, we all know they're near-on impossible to get if you have any income at all.;)
:rotfl::rotfl:All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards