Age 7 government child trust fund payments not being released!!!

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

Which brings us back to why two supposedly working people were granted social housing, in this day and age. Come on, we all know they're near-on impossible to get if you have any income at all.;)
:rotfl::rotfl:

There are many other factors involved in being eligible for a council house, that are nothing to do with income at all.

There you go again, more rubbish, but what else to expect.

I don't feel the need to reply.

Anyway, I thought you were the one complaining about people going off subject? Hypocrite, pot, kettle, black?

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

Which brings us back to why two supposedly working people were granted social housing, in this day and age. Come on, we all know they're near-on impossible to get if you have any income at all.;)
:rotfl::rotfl:

How do you know. They might of bought their house that happens to be on a council estate(Many people do buy their council houses and sell them on you know) And anyway my stepson has a council flat and he works.

POPPYOSCAR

There is an interesting thread on discussion time "Brothers mate giving up work to go on benefits so he can concentrate on warcraft"

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

There are many other factors involved in being eligible for a council house, that are nothing to do with income at all.

There you go again, more rubbish, but what else to expect.

I don't feel the need to reply.

Anyway, I thought you were the one complaining about people going off subject?

Hypocrite, pot, kettle, black?

How is it off subject to highlight the FACT that you have done nothing but moan about people's entitlement to benefits, whilst the whole time you are sat in subsidised housing, benefitting from cheap rents, no doubt the same house you hatched your little (failed plot) to swop your partners full time hours for state benefits?

And that is WITHOUT even delving into how two SUPPOSEDLY working people found themselves with a secure tenancy in a subsidised property in the first place.

Though not impossible to get a council house, extremely difficult. And in this case, even when homeless, if you have one, never mind TWO incomes, LA's will rather help you find a private let and send you on your way. but funny considering supporting comments on here like "16 year olds who get pregant just to get a council house". Hahaha

I suspect, you played the system yourself at some point, either that or you were unemployed/and or low income and in need of benefits including in housing need. Didn't you Liam

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

How is it off subject to highlight the FACT that you have done nothing but moan about people's entitlement to benefits, whilst the whole time you are sat in subsidised housing, benefitting from cheap rents, no doubt the same house you hatched your little (failed plot) to swop your partners full time hours for state benefits?

And that is WITHOUT even delving into how two SUPPOSEDLY working people found themselves with a secure tenancy in a subsidised property in the first place.

I suspect, you played the system yourself at some point, either that or you were unemployed/and or low income and in need of benefits including in housing need. Didn't you Liam

This is rich coming from someone who NEVER answers a question about themselves!

Deepmistrust

POPPYOSCAR wrote: »

This is rich coming from someone who NEVER answers a question about themselves!

I've never actually asked (bar rhetorical) questions about his personal life. He's volunteered the information that he has a council house, and tried to swop an earned wage for benefits.

It wouldn't be so funny, if it wasn't for the fact he's spent the last 18 pages accusing meanstested benefits receipients (of which he is one on at least one occasion) of being "lazy yada yada", and demaning they do community service for their tax-payer subsidised benefits. All the while declaring he supports his family himself IN A COUNCIL HOUSE!

So, he did need on at least one occasion the state to help him support his family after all.:rotfl::rotfl:

POPPYOSCAR

Deepmistrust wrote: »

I've never actually asked (bar rhetorical) questions about his personal life. He's volunteered the information that he has a council house, and tried to swop an earned wage for benefits.

It wouldn't be so funny, if it wasn't for the fact he's spent the last 18 pages accusing meanstested benefits receipients (of which he is one on at least one occasion) of being "lazy yada yada", and demaning they do community service for their tax-payer subsidised benefits. All the while declaring he supports his family himself IN A COUNCIL HOUSE!

So, he did need on at least one occasion the state to help him support his family after all.:rotfl::rotfl:

You just go round and round in circles.

I havn't yet read anything on here that says there should be no state benefits and that no one should ever receive any.You do not seem to realise that by your statements you continually reduce your point of view to extreme silliness.

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

How is it off subject to highlight the FACT that you have done nothing but moan about people's entitlement to benefits,

No what I have done is expressed my opinion on those that choose not to work and choose to live off benefits.

No matter how many times you say otherwise.

whilst the whole time you are sat in subsidised housing, benefitting from cheap rents,

Wasn't it you who was going on about the costs of housing, I guess that only applies to those who their is no real cost involved, ie those on benefits who get the house paid for.

no doubt the same house you hatched your little (failed plot) to swop your partners full time hours for state benefits?

I have already been through this several times. It isn't my problem you refuse to read or accept anything else that doesn't fit with your arguments.

And that is WITHOUT even delving into how two SUPPOSEDLY working people found themselves with a secure tenancy in a subsidised property in the first place.

Waste of time even bothering to reply really.

Though not impossible to get a council house, extremely difficult.

Yes it is. I should know, but then again you will be an expert on that too, you are a "professional" lets not forget.

And in this case, even when homeless, if you have one, never mind TWO incomes, LA's will rather help you find a private let and send you on your way.

Your wide ranging knowledge on benefits and local housing is something to admire.. (I was being sarcastic, I guess that will be wasted on you)

but funny considering supporting comments on here like "16 year olds who get pregant just to get a council house". Hahaha

Not at all related to my circumstances.

Not a comment I have even made on this thread either.

I suspect,

You suspect a lot, more often than not you are completely wrong with your suspicions.

you played the system yourself at some point, either that or you were unemployed/and or low income and in need of benefits

All wrong, just your wrong interpretation of my circumstances. Circumstances which about 90% is based on your own fabrication.

including in housing need. Didn't you Liam

Yes, I did need somewhere to live. So do most people.

When will it ever end?

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

tried to swop an earned wage for benefits.

More lies.

It wouldn't be so funny, if it wasn't for the fact he's spent the last 18 pages accusing meanstested benefits receipients (of which he is one on at least one occasion)

When was this? I have been in constant employment since leaving school at 16.

of being "lazy yada yada", and demaning they do community service for their tax-payer subsidised benefits.

Just more filler, for your meaningless posts.

All the while declaring he supports his family himself IN A COUNCIL HOUSE!

Is it such a shock to you that a working family can live in a council property?

So, he did need on at least one occasion the state to help him support his family after all.

When?

Do you think the more that you say something, the more it will make people believe it?

POPPYOSCAR

liam8282 wrote: »

Do you think the more that you say something, the more it will make people believe it?

I think he is implying that you have a 'state benefit' by living in a council house but conveniently omitting that you pay rent for that 'benefit'