We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ins will only replace one chair? is this right!

24

Comments

  • gazza975526570
    gazza975526570 Posts: 3,275 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Not quite sure why you would be calling IOB

    Firstly see what the chair they send/order is like - if its the same as the one damaged then there is no problem surely.

    If its different check your policy conditions - if it states only the damaged items will be replaced then little fursth you can do im afraid. You may be able to get a cash settlement of the appropriate price instead tho.
  • the suite has been discontinued so there is no matching chair available.
    the only booklet/policy i have ever recived has been from the principality building soc this is prob just me being dumb but i didnt even know that i was with royal sunalliance until now (as i pay it with my morgage through principality & was sold it by the principality building soc i also assumed i was insured by them.)
    as for the no claims bonus bit,i thought that was just for cars!
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    Andy_L wrote:
    If it was the neighbours fault surely you should be claiming off thier insurance, preserving you own no claims?

    You cannot claim from another policy holders insurance, you cannot claim from your insurers damage which has occurred to another policyholders property, the method is the policyholder's each claim from their respective policies, in the event one is liable for the damage the other insurers will counter claim, in practice this occurs very rarely as most people do not willfully or neglectfully damage anothers property and this is the criteria that needs to be fulfilled to satisfy a counterclaim.
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    gkf wrote:
    We had accidental damage to a sofa and our insurers direct line said they would only pay to replace the sofa. As the suite had been discontinued by M & S and it was a cloth one so hard to match, I complained and they checked their records and said that as we had been with them for years and never claimed before they would then cover the cost of a replacement suite.

    The proximate cause of this incident is escape of water and not accidental damage but a few calls nagging the insurance company and mentioning the iob may well result in a better offer although I very much doubt the cost of replacing the entire suite will be met,
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    hells wrote:
    Tip: Get yourself a policy which has unlimited cover, like M&S/Halifax.
    !

    I think if you check your policy wording you will find the term "unlimited" refers specifically to rebuild costs in the event of total loss due to fire or catastrophe etc, this does not extend to contents, I am not aware of a single contents policy which has unlimited cover and I am familiar with most if not all currently available policies.
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    the suite has been discontinued so there is no matching chair available.
    the only booklet/policy i have ever recived has been from the principality building soc this is prob just me being dumb but i didnt even know that i was with royal sunalliance until now (as i pay it with my morgage through principality & was sold it by the principality building soc i also assumed i was insured by them.)
    as for the no claims bonus bit,i thought that was just for cars!

    Your policy will almost certainly state in the event an identical match cannot be made the nearest possible match will be offered or a cash alternative to contribute towards total replacement, any offer of a percentage towards costs of replacing undamaged items is of a goodwill nature and not enforcable even by the IOB.
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
  • Gingham_Ribbon
    Gingham_Ribbon Posts: 31,520 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks for the link i will check it out.
    yes i do have building covered with them as well.
    i havent started talks over carpets with them yet as i apparently need a dry certificate (which is going to take about 4 weeks)first then the loss adjuster will come back to discuss (try to get out of paying for) "floor coverings"
    If they've said it was contaminated water it seems a bit much that they're making you go through all this.
    May all your dots fall silently to the ground.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    To be fair, we know nothing about the insurance policy. If it was taken out 15 years ago, then this is around the time that bedroom rated policies were starting to arrive so it could well be an older "specify" type policy. Indeed, you could still easily pick up home insurance plans then that were not new-for-old.

    If only one chair is damaged then they only need to replace that one chair. If the suite is quite old, then that would explain why you are not getting a full suite replacement.

    Royal Sun Alliance, or More Than to use it's current general insurance trading name, do have a pretty good reputation although most of that is gained on price and a successful advertising campaign that has told people that they are good and people believe that. I very much doubt the policy is on comparable terms to their current retail product. You are probably paying well over the odds for a part obsolete policy. Indeed, I wouldnt be surprised if you were to obtain a More Than quote, it would be cheaper and better cover than what you have already.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Astaroth
    Astaroth Posts: 5,444 Forumite
    ben500 wrote:
    You cannot claim from another policy holders insurance

    You certainly can claim directly from someone elses home insurance if they are liable for the incident. Not everyone has things like home insurance and so if your theory was true you would effectively be saying that you would never be able to get the money back.

    It is more common to go via your own insurance, as it is with people with comprehensive motor insurance going through their own rather than direct with the TPI but it does not prohibit the direct method.

    Of cause with home insurance type claims it is massively more difficult to actually proved negligence (eg prove that they knew the washing machine was faulty and it isnt just "bad luck") therefore it is often wiser to leave it to your insurers if you have that option.
    All posts made are simply my own opinions and are neither professional advice nor the opinions of my employers
    No Advertising or Links in Signatures by Site Rules - MSE Forum Team 2
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    Astaroth wrote:
    You certainly can claim directly from someone elses home insurance if they are liable for the incident. Not everyone has things like home insurance and so if your theory was true you would effectively be saying that you would never be able to get the money back.

    It is more common to go via your own insurance, as it is with people with comprehensive motor insurance going through their own rather than direct with the TPI but it does not prohibit the direct method.

    Of cause with home insurance type claims it is massively more difficult to actually proved negligence (eg prove that they knew the washing machine was faulty and it isnt just "bad luck") therefore it is often wiser to leave it to your insurers if you have that option.

    Go ahead and try.
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.