Co-OP and the tale of age verification

UK2010

peachyprice wrote: »

Oh, while you're here UK, you haven't responded to my post above where you falesly accused me of editing a post, an apology wouldn't go amiss.

You quoted it as if it were a fact when it was proceded by the word doubt. That is leaving doubt out of the quote!

marleyboy

peachyprice wrote: »

peachyprice wrote: »

an apology wouldn't go amiss.

UK2010

marleyboy wrote: »

It seems he is coming up with ANYTHING to come up with an explanation, however bizarre.

Who does he remind me of................

Tbh that's my vision of you two as well! VOR I've choose to put on ignore so can't see anymore as it's just a waste of my life reading his posts. I think I'll have to do the same with adouglas, another waste of time reading! I find your posts quite amusing Marleyboy, think I'll carry on reading yours, love the way you're doing exactly the same thing as me as far as keeping this debates going but you bizarrely can't see it!

adouglasmhor

UK2010 wrote: »

Yeah, can you quote my alleged lie for me, I've no idea what it is!

Just to give you a clue opinions aren't lies! I can see a you and a few other trying to quote things you disagree with saying it's a lie because you don't like that point of view. I hope it's not going to be the "alcohol" rather "than "alcohol you consume" "lie". I'll be very dissapointed if you try to pass that off as a lie!

That was it, the one you keep denying was a lie because you can't stop yourself from lying because that would involve admiting you got it wrong. The other one is below.

adouglasmhor

UK2010 wrote: »

Where?

Or is this where people quote me, add a few things I haven't said, try to put something I have said into a ridiculous context (see adouglasmhor's posts) then try claiming I'm wrong by the things they've added and twisted?



I personally wouldn't have refused to sell it. Can't see your point.

So what did I add or twist liar? I admit to highlighting how ridiculous your argument is though, I like to state the obvous :rotfl:

adouglasmhor

UK2010 wrote: »

Tbh that's my vision of you two as well! VOR I've choose to put on ignore so can't see anymore as it's just a waste of my life reading his posts. I think I'll have to do the same with adouglas, another waste of time reading! I find your posts quite amusing Marleyboy, think I'll carry on reading yours, love the way you're doing exactly the same thing as me as far as keeping this debates going but you bizarrely can't see it!

It will give everyone else a laugh seeing me slag off your spouting. I would hide too if I was as out classed as you.

marleyboy

UK2010 wrote: »

Tbh that's my vision of you two as well! VOR I've choose to put on ignore so can't see anymore as it's just a waste of my life reading his posts. I think I'll have to do the same with adouglas, another waste of time reading! I find your posts quite amusing Marleyboy, think I'll carry on reading yours, love the way you're doing exactly the same thing as me as far as keeping this debates going but you bizarrely can't see it!

Can't see what exactly? The Labels of products, the shapes and sizes of each item, the alcohol content or the blurred shopping assistants?

Nope whatever it is I am meant to see, I cannot see it, with every post you have offered me upto now, all I can see is........

boobyd

I will put my final bit, the posts are getting more "amusing" each day !
I think the till did not bleep, ask for ID, I would guess the till op saw "wine " and went ah, ah, its got wine in it, i must/will check for ID , as I said before no CIS are not age restricted , never have been (been in food retail for 25+ years) The only other possibilty is the store for whatever reason added a local flag to its system, again seems unlikely as most of these functions are controlled centrally. But I could be wrong;)

voiceofreason

UK2010 wrote: »

Tbh that's my vision of you two as well! VOR I've choose to put on ignore so can't see anymore as it's just a waste of my life reading his posts. I think I'll have to do the same with adouglas, another waste of time reading! I find your posts quite amusing Marleyboy, think I'll carry on reading yours, love the way you're doing exactly the same thing as me as far as keeping this debates going but you bizarrely can't see it!

Well that's a clear win for the UK2010 debating technique.

For reference, kids, this technique is:
Thesis -> Antithesis -> Spout faeces -> Backtrack, panic, set to "ignore"

Feel free to copy and use yourselves (if you want to look bloody silly)!

Strange, though, that UK2010 feels the need to make reference to my posts "wasting his life"; they are so clearly as droplets of diversion in the wide, tempestuous, squalling ocean of his own self-reverential pointlessness.

I've had morning dumps that were more useful and had more relevance to the online community than this clown's nonsense.

(Also, is there any chance of someone "quote"-ing one of my posts, so that when I call him a "pointless nobber" he can see it, and it's that much more worthwhile? Petty and slightly childish, I know - but it pleases me to think of it. Thanks.)

Zazen999

voiceofreason wrote: »

Well that's a clear win for the UK2010 debating technique.

For reference, kids, this technique is:
Thesis -> Antithesis -> Spout faeces -> Backtrack, panic, set to "ignore"

Feel free to copy and use yourselves (if you want to look bloody silly)!

Strange, though, that UK2010 feels the need to make reference to my posts "wasting his life"; they are so clearly as droplets of diversion in the wide, tempestuous, squalling ocean of his own self-reverential pointlessness.

I've had morning dumps that were more useful and had more relevance to the online community than this clown's nonsense.

(Also, is there any chance of someone "quote"-ing one of my posts, so that when I call him a "pointless nobber" he can see it, and it's that much more worthwhile? Petty and slightly childish, I know - but it pleases me to think of it. Thanks.)

Assuming that I'm not 'on the list'....