We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please help re flat deposit
Comments
-
clutton wrote:......Does the court know that this woman has a number of names ? if not, please tell them asap.
anyone else got any ideas on this ?A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
clutton wrote:then you edited itA house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
Would it help to employ a debt collecting agency?0
-
clutton wrote:...i now know that this woman uses a variety of different names, all terribly similar to each other. This is a classic criminal strategy. This can be construed as as attempt at deception. Anyone can change their names, simply by saying, "i am now elsie bloggs" or whatever, or by using a deed poll to publicly change their name.
BUT, name-changing is not legal if the reason for changing names is to deceive or defraud others...
This is now beyond a Civil matter - it needs to be turned across to the police and reported as a possible criminal matter.
If I were you though I'd be in the front door of the LA at 9am for a very short conversation in view of this. I'd give them 24 hours to hand you copies of everything they have on her identity, or you'll pass all their names to the police as well - remind them of the penalties for aiding and abetting a fraudster.
I suspect the DPA may go out the window in that case!0 -
Get your local newspaper - the Argus - in on it - you might even want to show them this thread!
(edited version!!) 2 great stories in one!
A good landlord story always plays well:
http://www.theargus.co.uk/search/display.var.892773.0.electric_shock_victim_takes_court_action_against_landlord.php
This looks like the lady to contact:
News editor, Melanie Dowding
melanie.dowding@theargus.co.uk0 -
Just popped into wish you the best of luck..taken me 2 hours to read this, and have been up and down with you. I agree that this is the sort of thing that needs the police involved...shame Esther Rantzen isn't around anymore- what about Nicky Cambell and Watchdog??!!
Don't give up now- its not for the money (past that stage) its for the moral victory....and just think of that Thai beach....:jI am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA),but this site does not check my status as such, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's code of conduct for IFAs. Anything I post on this forum is for discussion purposes only, and should not be construed as financial advice.0 -
Thanks again all for the support - feeling a bit better today and your PM's have been fantastic - just to answer a few Q's before heading to work and also summarise a bit for newbies:
- We left our previous flat in very good condition, expecting a max deduction of £50 or £100. We were advised that over and above KEEPING all of our £625, the landlady wished to charge us an extra £70-£80 for 'extras'. We requested invoices/receipts in order to dispute this amount, as no tenant who leaves a flat in perfect condition should pay this. We were also aware the landlady was planning to rennovate her entire apartment for the next tenant.
- Over the past 5 months we have been trying to get most or at least some of our deposit back with no avail. Despite the deposit amount being disputed by us, we were advised LAST WEEK that the letting agent gave back the entire amount in August to the landlord knowing we were commencing court proceedings. The deposit amount was £625 and she kept ALL of it in this way, there was no fairness, the letting agent and her simply agreed.
- We commenced court proceedings in September after sending 3 warning letters to her known address (this in itself took alot of investigating as she returned these letters to sender) and also to the letting agent. We received no response from landlord so were forced to proceed and spend £80 court fees.
- Court Judgement was awarded in our favour last week by default as the landlord did not respond - all letters were returned to the court.
- Last week we faxed and posted the letting agent requesting our deposit back in view of being awarded judgement against the landlady. As we had paid the letting agent the £625 to hold 2 years ago, we thought they would be able to give it back to us.They replied on Saturday 4th Nov and advised that the deposit had (conveniently) already been returned to the landlady in August, before court proceedings commenced, but at a time when they knew very well we were disputing the amount in full and were considering court action.
- We have now been advised by the letting agent that she has moved. We have faxed them yesterday asking for her address, but have had nothing so far.
Answers to Questions:
- This landlady has no company so I can't issue winding order etc
- Could we go to the Argus even though the landlady may claim she knows nothing about the case?
- We cannot afford to spend much more on this case - £100 max and even then we wonder if it is throwing good money after bad
- We now no longer know her address unless the letting agent provides it. If they do not, we will write to ARLA
Thanks all!MFW #185
Mortgage slowly being offset! £86,987 /58,742 virtual balance
Original mortgage free date 2037/ Now Nov 2034 and counting :T
YNAB lover0 -
EagerLearner wrote:Answers to Questions:
- Could we go to the Argus even though the landlady may claim she knows nothing about the case?
Sorry to be rude, but you are still being too nice.
OF COURSE, she knows about the case - she's just a serial criminal who is well practised in these things. Why not instead take the informed view that she's no doubt got a track record as long as your arm in doing the same thing to others before you?
OF COURSE The LA know all about all of that and took the decision to work with her - by implication their hands are dirty.
If you work from that premise I think you'll get on much better.0 -
when i was getting divorced my ex-husband was constantly telling my solicitor that he was moving abroad - he never did !!
do you KNOW she has moved - have you knocked on the door of her address ? sent a recorded delivery letter there ? asked the postman/milkmkan on that round ?
""Could we go to the Argus""
- of course - YOU'VE GOT A COURT ORDER AGAINST HER !!!!!!!
If you are getting tired or all this, and want to spend no more money, then, this bad publicity route might well give you some moral satisfaction if nothing else.0 -
Having spent a couple of hours reading the entire thread last night (phewwwwww.........!) I can only add my name to the increasingly vociferous support you are getting from this thread - you simply musn't give up at this late stage; that woman has got to be nailed!
Like another poster...I thought (from the thread title) that you were seeking support in raising money for a deposit - but then saw the thread ran to some 30 pages.....curiosity killed the cat... had a look....and was hooked!
The LA seems a slippery customer too. There was one point someone raised way back in the thread about their precise role as the letting agent as set out in the Tenancy Agreement. The only reason I raise this is that a couple of years ago we let our house, through a letting agent, and I distinctly recall that the agent held the deposit as "stakeholder" and was obliged to return the deposit to the tenant within, I think, 60 days from the end of the Tenancy Agreement. If there was a dispute (which there was), the money was to be held until formal arbitration (or other agreement) resolved the issue. There was certainly no question of the LA just handing over the deposit to the landlord in the circumstances you find yourself in.
This is a rather long winded way of saying....have you checked your Tenancy Agreement to ensure that the LA adhered strictly to the terms of the agreement, relating to this particular aspect (ie treatment of the deposit monies). If it can be shown that they acted improperly, then they may just be a little more amenable in disclosing a certain address you need.
Best of luck!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards