We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Friend keeps looking what I am buying...
Comments
-
I think you've answered your own question thereMoglex wrote:How can it be morally wrong?
The seller can set any price they like as a starting price. Shill bidding is just a way of doing that in a manner that deprives fleabay of some listing fee.
If you enter into a contract with eBay and then try to rip them off then it's morally wrong.Can I help?0 -
My problem with shilling is that it creates the appearance of false demand.
Essentially a seller who shills is lying to his customers about what the item is worth... and how much demand there is for it.My TV is broken!
Edit: refunded £515 for TV 1.5 years out of warranty - thank you Sale of Goods Act! :j0 -
Would you take up a second chance offer for an item that had been shilled? Would I? NFW!My TV is broken!

Edit: refunded £515 for TV 1.5 years out of warranty - thank you Sale of Goods Act! :j0 -
Well, ebay seem to be quite happy to rip people off right left and centre and are quite big and ugly enough to look after their own interests.rdwarr wrote:I think you've answered your own question there
If you enter into a contract with eBay and then try to rip them off then it's morally wrong.
I actually meant, apart from depriving poor struggling ebay inc, I can't see what's morally wrong.0 -
Well, yes, that's true, but what sort of an idiot buys something just because someone else wants it?frivolous_fay wrote:My problem with shilling is that it creates the appearance of false demand.
Essentially a seller who shills is lying to his customers about what the item is worth... and how much demand there is for it.
Possibly the reason I can't see much wrong with shilling from the buyer's pov is that it will only affect people who are using completely illogical ways to determine what they will bid for and how much they'll bid.
Plus, of course, the shiller is quite likely to win the item and end up paying fleabay fees for nothing!0 -
Morality is all relative. Different people will draw the line at different places.
If it's not morally wrong to defraud eBay then is it morally wrong to shoplift from Tesco? If that's alright then is it OK to mug a successful businessman? Or his wife?
Somewhere in that lot you will have drawn your own line
Can I help?0 -
Moglex wrote:Well, yes, that's true, but what sort of an idiot buys something just because someone else wants it?
No shortage of idiots on ebay!
If you thought 10 other people had their eye on an item, wouldn't you feel really chuffed with yourself if you won it? You might think it was rarer, and more desirable. and more valuable than it really is. (or perhaps just an idiot might)Moglex wrote:Possibly the reason I can't see much wrong with shilling from the buyer's pov is that it will only affect people who are using completely illogical ways to determine what they will bid for and how much they'll bid.
It affects those with poor bidding technique, I'll grant you. Although arguably it has affected many of us 'clever' folk too - if you don't care if you're being shilled, would you go looking for the warning signs?Moglex wrote:Plus, of course, the shiller is quite likely to win the item and end up paying fleabay fees for nothing!
Only stupid shillers. Sadly in shorter supply than stupid bidders
My TV is broken!
Edit: refunded £515 for TV 1.5 years out of warranty - thank you Sale of Goods Act! :j0 -
Have you checked to see if the person who set your computer up has installed a keylogger, and now knows ALL your details/passwords?0
-
As I said, I was refering to morality of the behaviouras it affected the bidders, so that question does not really arise - at least in my case (plus, I don't sell on fleabay).rdwarr wrote:Morality is all relative. Different people will draw the line at different places.
If it's not morally wrong to defraud eBay then is it morally wrong to shoplift from Tesco? If that's alright then is it OK to mug a successful businessman? Or his wife?
Somewhere in that lot you will have drawn your own line
As to others, yes they would each have to draw their own line.
Everyone has their line. If you find £100 do you had it in to the police? £50? £10? £5?, £1?
I'm not saying I think it's good behaviour, just that it should be a very small problem in the general scheme of things. There's far worse being done by buyers, sellers and ebay itself many times a day as witnessed by the posts on this very forum.0 -
Actually no.frivolous_fay wrote:If you thought 10 other people had their eye on an item, wouldn't you feel really chuffed with yourself if you won it?
My enjoyment at winning something is always tempered by feeling sorry for those who lost. I know what it feels like, after all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
