PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Plumber visit - bill 5months later

Apologies if this is the wrong place…

We had a water leak in our bathroom last Oct – called insurance company who advised us they would cover the damage repairs but that we were responsible for the source of the leak – and advised us to get a plumber out to look asap. We called a plumber – they sent someone round – we explained the insurance scenario – he was with us less than 15mins and gave us his diagnosis. The insurance company then instructed a different company to carry out the work & it transpired that the initial diagnosis given was wrong.

5months later we receive a bill from the original plumbers company for work carried out £190 – we call & query it & advise that no work was carried out – they then explain that the guy who visited has left the company had left & they weren’t sure?! They then send another bill for £55 +vat for a call out charge… now exactly 14 days later we received a revised bill with a £40 added admin fee for taking 14+ days to pay!

Can they send a bill 5months after the event – particularly when they don’t seem to know what was done?
Can they charge a call out fee without telling us?
«13

Comments

  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Don't telephone, write a recorded delivery letter disputing the invoice.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • mlz1413
    mlz1413 Posts: 2,961 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Put a response in WRITING to the company saying that although you agree a plumber did attend a call out on xx/xx/xx that he was advised before carrying out any work that the work was for an insurance company and you would therefore advise that the company should direct their bill to XXXX insurance company. Put all the bills received into the envelope and send it recorded deliver.

    Keep copies of what you have returned and a make yourself a note of dates that you phoned them for your own reference.

    I would not enter into any other verbal commuication with this company, they are just hoping you will pay and it closes an old job on their books.
  • clutton_2
    clutton_2 Posts: 11,149 Forumite
    ""Can they send a bill 5months after the event"


    ""but that we were responsible for the source of the leak – and advised us to get a plumber out to look asap.

    they did the work why dont you want to pay them ?
  • clutton wrote: »
    ""Can they send a bill 5months after the event"


    ""but that we were responsible for the source of the leak – and advised us to get a plumber out to look asap.

    they did the work why dont you want to pay them ?

    sorry perhaps you didn't read my post? they didn't do any work..

    the guy visited for 10minutes & gave a diagnosis of what was causing the leak - which later turned out to be incorrect..

    then 5 months later they sent a bill for the completion of all work carried out (not the call out), including incorrect statement of what work carried out as well..
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So write a recorded delivery letter disputing the invoice.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • clutton_2
    clutton_2 Posts: 11,149 Forumite
    ""the guy visited for 10minutes & gave a diagnosis of what was causing the leak ""

    the guy still needs paying ...... he has reduced the bill as recognition that he only did a diagnostic visit

    i expect the add on amount of £40 was as per his terms and conditions of trading.. most building type self employed buisnesess only offer credit for 14 days....
  • clutton wrote: »
    ""the guy visited for 10minutes & gave a diagnosis of what was causing the leak ""

    the guy still needs paying ...... he has reduced the bill as recognition that he only did a diagnostic visit

    i expect the add on amount of £40 was as per his terms and conditions of trading.. most building type self employed buisnesess only offer credit for 14 days....


    I dont dispute they came out - but should they not advise up front that there is a call out charge ??

    the previous bill was entirely made up at their own admittance - i find it unfair that they can bill us a whole 5months later when we didn't even know we'd incurred any fees - then 14days to the day - they whack on £40 fee?
  • clutton wrote: »
    ""the guy visited for 10minutes & gave a diagnosis of what was causing the leak ""

    the guy still needs paying ...... he has reduced the bill as recognition that he only did a diagnostic visit

    i expect the add on amount of £40 was as per his terms and conditions of trading.. most building type self employed buisnesess only offer credit for 14 days....
    Sorry, have to disagree. He turned up, yes, but he did not diagnose the correct fault and then left.
    I wouldn't pay as he has not done the correct job. The 5 month delay for the bill has nothing to do with it.
  • caeler
    caeler Posts: 2,633 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! Photogenic
    Do as firefox says!!! You say you were not told about a call out charge, did they make it was clear it was free diagnosis? I'm not sure how it stands legally but usually diagnosis costs money, so they might be allowed to imply a fee. (Unfair yes but possibly correct).
  • I had a very similar situation (without any insurance involved). I disputed the bill, offered to pay a small token for petrol costs and they eventually agree to charge me nothing at all. My arguments were similar to yours - the plumber had come out, stayed briefly however the essential point is the diagnosis was incorrect. Therefore if you had paid for this company to undertake the work it wouldn't have fixed the problem and would have made you incur further costs. Therefore I refused to pay for a diagnosis as it was incorrect.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.