📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

need some help here, please read

2

Comments

  • emmell
    emmell Posts: 1,228 Forumite
    I thought buying from auction, whether it be ebay or usual auction, meant 'you pays your money you takes your choice'. Otherwise what's the point of an auction.
    ML.
    He who has four and spends five, needs neither purse nor pocket
  • Ivrytwr3
    Ivrytwr3 Posts: 6,304 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    have you actually spoken to the seller? Giving him the opportunity to help and BEFORE you start any action against him?
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    emmell wrote: »
    I thought buying from auction, whether it be ebay or usual auction, meant 'you pays your money you takes your choice'. Otherwise what's the point of an auction.
    ML.
    Exactly my thoughts.

    Any test drive or viewing should take place before the auction ends.
  • Kurtis_Blue
    Kurtis_Blue Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    emmell wrote: »
    I thought buying from auction, whether it be ebay or usual auction, meant 'you pays your money you takes your choice'. Otherwise what's the point of an auction.
    ML.

    eBay is not an auction, even when its an auction.
  • dcy_2
    dcy_2 Posts: 26 Forumite
    Was the eBay ID "Registered as a Business Seller"? if the advert was trade and you brought from trade premises then your covered no matter what the receipt says.

    But what you are legally protected for would be minimal on a £650 van, possibly just that it was safe and road worthy may be all you could have expected.
    Do you know the issue yet?

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260546170968&ssPageName=STRK:MEBOFFX:IT

    This is the advert, i dont think he is registered as a business seller.
  • dcy_2
    dcy_2 Posts: 26 Forumite
    Ivrytwr3 wrote: »
    have you actually spoken to the seller? Giving him the opportunity to help and BEFORE you start any action against him?

    I tried to call he the minute it brokedown, he didnt answer, i eventually spoke to him the evening after, even tho i rang and txt over 20 times. He will except no resposibility.
  • Kurtis_Blue
    Kurtis_Blue Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    Clearly trading on eBay under his business name AKA Cars.
    So you are covered but obviously will depend on what the issue is, plus the hassle of getting anything from them.
    I would still send some recorded correspondence stating your case and intended action, its worth £2.
  • dcy_2
    dcy_2 Posts: 26 Forumite
    Clearly trading on eBay under his business name AKA Cars.
    So you are covered but obviously will depend on what the issue is, plus the hassle of getting anything from them.
    I would still send some recorded correspondence stating your case and intended action, its worth £2.

    What do you mean by this?
  • Wig
    Wig Posts: 14,139 Forumite
    edited 8 February 2010 at 10:12PM
    dcy wrote: »
    What do you mean by this?

    He means you send him a letter that you reject the car asking for a full refund under SOGA, not fit for purpose. not as decribed etc. Followed by subsequent letters giving 14 days to comply other wise you will start legal proceedings.

    And you send that letter recorded delivery.

    Any trader with any sense would ignore such a letter(s) and wait for you to lay out a case at the small claims courts, and then they would wait for you to pay the second fee to the court to get a hearing date, only then will they either pay up or see you in court.

    You either win your £650 plus £135 costs back or you lose another £135
  • Kurtis_Blue
    Kurtis_Blue Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    Wig wrote: »
    He means you send him a letter that you reject the car asking for a full refund under SOGA, not fit for purpose. not as decribed etc. Followed by subsequent letters giving 14 days to comply other wise you will start legal proceedings.

    And you send that letter recorded delivery.

    Any trader with any sense would ignore such a letter(s) and wait for you to lay out a case at the small claims courts, and then they would wait for you to pay the second fee to the court to get a hearing date, only then will they either pay up or see you in court.

    You either win your £650 plus £135 costs back or you lose another £135

    This.^

    But you could allways suggest a middle way of paying repairs, meeting half way on costs etc..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.