We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bank Charges Reclaiming Guide discussion

Options
1171172174176177181

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It's also quite possible that the account did give you benefits, such as a reduced interest rate on the mortgage, alongside other features

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • I'm not in financial hardship now but I was in a great deal of hardship when I was receiving all the charges a number of years ago. The charges were spiralling and making my situation worse. Can I still claim the charges back for the hardship it caused me at the time?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    No. .
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    CatieBrown wrote: »
    I'm not in financial hardship now
    Therefore there is no point in you trying to "claim back" charges. Historical charges have not been refunded for a decade now.

    Only current financial hardship cases are considered and, even then, banks are under no obligation to refund anything. The Banks are only required to behave sympathetically towards customers suffering hardship now and they have a range of options such as suspending interest or offering debt management available to them.

    Read this thread, just a few pages will suffice, and you will see your question asked and answered again and again..
  • Tink660
    Tink660 Posts: 7 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary First Post
    Hi, we had a Business account with Nat West from 1991 to approx 2003. We had so many bank charges, which put us in severe hardship at the time. It was a cycle we could not get out of, some days we would be hit with 3 or maybe more charges if £32 in one day. Then a customer would pay and it would be swallowed up by the charges. We did start a claim which was going well until the court case stopped any claiming. We still have all the paperwork and statements. Would it be possible to revisit this claim now. I know that so many years have elapsed since we had the account but would appreciate any thoughts.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    No. .
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,634 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Tink660 wrote: »
    Hi, we had a Business account with Nat West from 1991 to approx 2003. We had so many bank charges, which put us in severe hardship at the time. It was a cycle we could not get out of, some days we would be hit with 3 or maybe more charges if £32 in one day. Then a customer would pay and it would be swallowed up by the charges. We did start a claim which was going well until the court case stopped any claiming. We still have all the paperwork and statements. Would it be possible to revisit this claim now. I know that so many years have elapsed since we had the account but would appreciate any thoughts.

    Limited company or self employed? Not that it really matters now but a Limited company cant be financial hardship.

    As you know, the court case ended reclaiming on "unfair" charges and today only "current" financial hardship cases are considered. Even then, its a on a goodwill basis and often includes other methods, such as suspending future charges or putting you on debt management plan etc and may not include any refund.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Shurl17
    Shurl17 Posts: 1 Newbie
    I’ve had a Barclays addition account for years. I want to claim the charges back, but I don’t have any paperwork i.e statements and I’m even unsure of the year I opened the account. Would I be able to request this from the bank directly?
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You can't claim them back, You make a complaint that the account was missold [that's if it's apackaged ban account you're complaining about]
    Bear in mind that to complain you need complaint reasons, it's not enough just to want the charges back.
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Shurl17 wrote: »
    I’ve had a Barclays addition account for years. I want to claim the charges back, but I don’t have any paperwork i.e statements and I’m even unsure of the year I opened the account. Would I be able to request this from the bank directly?


    If you were unhappy about a packaged account, you can complain but you need to show why this was miss-sold to you with evidence. Given the account was opened, by the sound of it, more than 6 years ago and the fact you'll have been getting annual statements of benefits with details of other accounts, it's quite probably time barred anyway even if there was a miss-selling reason.


    If you mean actual charges like late fees etc, then no, you can't.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.