Any idears

Blob

Very simply put theres and not what has been supplied and backed up by solicitors [and they are real solicitors x2] and estat agents. Again the CSA and the people that work within it believe they are above the law and the Courts!!!!

kelloggs36

So the courts won't allow it if there is not enough equity in the property in your share to pay off the debt.

Blob

They should not have allowed the LO as it was proved that the CSA were not telling the truth it has been admitted that they have used fals figures in Court by a Regional Manager and in writting, they have refused to take into account payments that were made as child maint and labeled as such and have failed to take into account houseing costs that were accepted as such on a tecnical point! Why should it change now?

The CSA has also failed to give the Court undertakings that have been requested by the Court! They for sure are going to have to show cause just why this is, but I now have no faith left in the system, and may well take inderpendent action on my own and we will see how they like it!

Blob

I spoke to the solicitors today and they will be phoneing back tommorrow, they say that they are now going to seek a conclusion to this matter. As I am to be served with papers under the MWPA by my former fianecee, on Monday of so I am led to believe, it is accerdemic really! There will be nothing for them or anyone else come to that! Chalk one up to the CSA for makeing sure that they get nothing from someone that they have clamed and in writing was compliant untill they messed the case up, the words of the CEO's office!

Blob

Up date they did not phone back for a further 2 days!! Must be the CSA link!!

They have now decided to wait till a few things have been sorted!! They also dont like the idea of answering tot he press, as they are intrested in this case now!

I told them that I was guessing but thought that the headline would run something like; CSA take on a Sollicitor in Leeds to force the sale of homes and take money from NRPP's. They did not seem to like this point of view especially when I asked for the press officer for the Solicitors!!!

The Sec of State has answered the letter and phone calls from my MP, so will have to wait for the out come of that. Am expecting to be served with papers from my ex.fiancee as well, and the CSA solicitors have asked to see these as well, as it would seem that they are now of theopinion that this case may cause them more harm than the fee is worth!!!! How sad!

Blob

The CSA solicitors now have asked to see the Judgment of an Appeal Judge where he asked for "undertakings" from the CSA. This on its own may cause the case to be thrown out by the solicitors!

Anyone that has problems and every case is different, if your partner/wife/husband has an intrest in the home you live in and they try this hevey handed approach and you can prove the equite belonge to your other half, make an application under the 'Trust of Lands Act' as this puts the whole matter before the Court and bleat as they like the CSA can't do thing one about it, it effectivly removes all of the power the CSA believe that they have from them and places it back in the hands of the Judge!

Do the CSA like this, not one little bit and they try to keep this very quirt!!

Blob

Have recieved the letter that the S of S has sent back to my MP, it seems that the CSA are now lieing to the S of S, as the letter states things that are incorrect to say the least, this will be taken further. By the calculation that they have sent to the Minister I have to have arrears of apx £101,640 how much do I earn?

Anyone in this situation however should look into section 2 of the act, if you have the children stay with you for any time then the wealfair of the children has to be taken into account by the agency! The Minister also states that they have to take into account the supply of local housing so you have somewhere to move too! Apparintly I now only have one child as well, wounder which one we lost along the line?

THe fact that you also pay towards the arrears in the view of the CSA is no grounds for you to complain even if they admit that they have made teh mistake that led to the arrears in the first place.

The Solicitor acting for the CSA is holding its hand at this time as it is now not sure of its case, so there is a conflict of information and it seems that the CSA is again makeing it up as it goes along.

There is to be a meeting with my MP to take this matter further and action to be taken against the people in the CSA that have given false information to the Minister!

To be contnued.

shock222

all the best bob i keep my eyes open for your updates :rolleyes:

shock222

i did not realise this smiley was eyes rollled sacastic :eek:

Blob

Have been in talks with my MP and he is now going to push for Parlimentry investigation in to CSA/C-MEC and the 2 year fiasco, and trying to make NRP's that pay homeless!!!

He was a barrister before being an MP and understands the 'White Book' and the rules there in! He agrees that the Law will beat the CSA in this instance or should do.

If you have an agreement to pay off arrears and you have been awarded compensation by the Ombudsman and ICE then if that compensation is a reduction in your arrears that have been caused by the failings of the CSA that they stand and are not liable for an LO or any other form of enforcment, end of!

Am sure that the usual possy of PWC that think that NRP's should be distroyed and that I am waisting my time in what I am doing, will not agree with this line of though,but hay tough luck my MP thinks that this is the way to go.

He will also be asking about the fact that children are now taking action against the CSA!

He is also interested in the fact that there is a planed demonstration for April with a petiton being handed in to No 10 and that it is by both PWC and NRP's and that it will be by apx 600 people!