Mobiles.co.uk - never mind the truth!

thommy

mobilejunkie wrote: »

Yes; you posted on them too. Not only do you presume to speak for everyone else but you also now to presume to know who was doing the abusing. Not much you don't know, is there? Apart from having any direct dealings with this company yourself given your reticence to answer my earlier question.

Innuendo suggests I'm not clear enough, so guess I'll just have to keep on chipping away for those who do have an actual interest in this company.

yet again you miss the point - innuendo:in this instance, your thinly veiled personal attack.
where do you keep getting this theory that when someone makes a point they presume to speak for everyone else? i told you, I (me-the person writing, the individual) am sick and tired of your vitriolic tirades, to such an extent that you go past the point of presenting an argument.
how do you know i don't have any direct dealings? maybe i excercise my right to anonymity-now where have i heard that before?
funny how good you are at pointing out other peoples reticence to answer a question. in keeping with your rants, it's all on your terms.
i don't need to speak for other people;there seems to be a growing list of people who are happy to thank each other for expressing somewhat similar viewpoints

mobilejunkie

thommy wrote: »

yet again you miss the point - innuendo:in this instance, your thinly veiled personal attack.
where do you keep getting this theory that when someone makes a point they presume to speak for everyone else? i told you, I (me-the person writing, the individual) am sick and tired of your vitriolic tirades, to such an extent that you go past the point of presenting an argument.
how do you know i don't have any direct dealings? maybe i excercise my right to anonymity-now where have i heard that before?
funny how good you are at pointing out other peoples reticence to answer a question. in keeping with your rants, it's all on your terms.
i don't need to speak for other people;there seems to be a growing list of people who are happy to thank each other for expressing somewhat similar viewpoints

You know all about veiled personal attacks. You asked where I got the "idea" from and I quoted the answer - YOU. I am presenting information, warnings and "arguments" - it is you and a handful of others who seem bent on stopping me by claiming I'm not. Again, I asked about your dealings with this dealer and you declined to answer; an answer obviously would not take away any of your anonymity but would at least show that you have a vague idea of what you're talking about - if you were to actually address the issues instead of concentrating on me personally. "Peer pressure" is irrelevant both to my response and the issues with this dealer. If you're "sick and tired" of hearing the issues go and express your valuable contributions where they won't make you ill. Your particular peer group seems totally disinterested in the issues - thereby it is you and they who are "missing the point".

thommy

mobilejunkie wrote: »

You know all about veiled personal attacks. You asked where I got the "idea" from and I quoted the answer - YOU. I am presenting information, warnings and "arguments" - it is you and a handful of others who seem bent on stopping me by claiming I'm not. Again, I asked about your dealings with this dealer and you declined to answer; an answer obviously would not take away any of your anonymity but would at least show that you have a vague idea of what you're talking about - if you were to actually address the issues instead of concentrating on me personally. "Peer pressure" is irrelevant both to my response and the issues with this dealer. If you're "sick and tired" of hearing the issues go and express your valuable contributions where they won't make you ill. Your particular peer group seems totally disinterested in the issues - thereby it is you and they who are "missing the point".

:A
thank you self-anointed one

i would bow to your superbly crafted arguments - if they weren't somewhat oxymoronic:rotfl:

mobilejunkie

Anything I say on here is oxymoronic to you. However, you have the same right and opportunity to express your opinion as I do.

thommy

mobilejunkie wrote: »

Anything I say on here is oxymoronic to you. However, you have the same right and opportunity to express your opinion as I do.

not, not anything. i just don't have to agree with everything.and if i don't, it doesn't mean that it is a personal attack

mobilejunkie

Fair enough - though since I posted number 3 on here this morning drawing attention to customers of this dealer to another problem which some of them are highly likely to have all the responses have ignored that issue totally (apart from an eventual "challenge" to produce the obvious remedy publicly). I would have though that anyone who is genuinely interested in the issues with this dealer would be more concerned with that than the fact that it was me who posted it.

As for post number one; it is about facts and any "subjective" opinions I expressed are based on those and personal experience with this dealer. I find it strange that a few seem to merely want to attempt to score points against me rather than aknowledge the reason for this thread - i.e. that Mobiles.co.uk is increasingly dishonest and tells a lot of untruths which unwitting customers and potential customers need to be made aware of. I did precisely the same when I became aware very early on that other cpw companies were becoming untrustworthy and received similar "thanks" for my efforts - until it became clear to an increasing army of unhappy customers that my warnings were very much justified.

If this is another "rant" then I am happy to be accused of it since there are potential customers on the site who have at least decided to think again about using this dealer, or who have as a result decided to use them but with complete caution. As far as I'm concerned, that makes my "rants" worthwhile.