Leggings

mum2one

juby_2002 wrote: »

i agree, although im not really into fashion as such,, i like to look a bit fasionable and casual at the same time IYSWIM, im not really bothered about where i get my clothes from as i have never had ani issues with them,,,,, BUT,,,,

im the same with DD shoes, i got her a pair of clarks £34 for school (which i dont think is massivly expensive) and they last the WHOLE year provided she doesnt grow out of them. the quality is fantastic and id rather pay that than have to buy 4 or 5 pairs through out the year which have fallen apart.

(dd has a tendancy to scrape her feet along the floor as she walks and can trip over thin air leading to numerous scuffs)

Great minds think alike with clarks shoes for dd - the ones we had a problem with was the original dolly in the heel - they lasted a whole 6weeks, the heel had wore down, but we returned them and Clarks shop was actually brilliant, they exchanged them for a differebt style, very mse as got her feet checked!! and she'd grown half a size, so new shoes for free.
Def agree Clarks are really gppd strong, virtually school proof shoes x

mippy

The 'tall' range in New Look is for 'women 5' 6" and over'.

piratefairy

mippy wrote: »

The 'tall' range in New Look is for 'women 5' 6" and over'.

Arg, sorry..But I've found that sometimes the talll version of a dress they have in the regular ranges is better for me as it's a little longer, even though I'm only just 5'6"..
They may be worth a try?!

mippy

I'll have a look - I just find NL's idea of 'tall' a bit bizarre!

Floss

SO can I pick everyone's brains...I'm thinking about leggings again, but want a pair of thick, good quality ones. Seeing as the last time I bought any was probably in the 1980's, where's the best places to start looking now??

[Deleted User]

I got a lovely brown pair from Jane Norman, fit well and are not see through, but they were £12. Have yet to wash them. I too wore them in the eighties lol. Today i bought a jumper which was supposed to go with the brown leggings but unfortunately it only just covers my bum so thats got to go back as i think there best when your tops, jumpers etc are longer as a VPL is a no no.

BeenieCat

coralred wrote: »

Have yet to wash them. I too wore them in the eighties

Ewwwwwww, 25 years of not washing :eek:

:D;)

[Deleted User]

Lol you know what i mean. Ive not worn the new ones just tried them on and i was one of the original wearers in the eighties lol. Not even i could get away with that

[Deleted User]

:eek: OMG!!!!!!!! I would never, ever in a million years where white leggings. I dont even like white jeans, only classic white trousers then i still feel strange and im a size 8 to 10. I did see the classic fat legs and bum today on a young girl with a baby. Dont they look in the mirror when they get dressed:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

BeenieCat

I don't like white leggings at all. I'm sure there would be an exception but i've never seen it.

I have white legs naturally, no need for leggings