Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: House price rise predicted by MoneySavers

1141517192036

Comments

  • julieq wrote: »
    What I really object to is not the arguments from the bear side - they're entitled to their opinions - but the abject contempt in which they hold anyone with differing views and their mob mentality. Anyone who had predicted EXACTLY what has happened since 2007 in 2007 would have been shouted down and mocked as a fool. On the other hand they have got just about everything wrong, from the idea of Zimbabwe style hyperinflation from QE, oil price inflation, the scale of the house price crash, the rise this year (longest Spring EVER!), the resilience of rental income, the lack of BTL bankruptcies in any significant numbers, etc, etc. In the face of being so utterly and completely wrong, most people would ask themselves if they may have been mistaken, but in fact what happens is that they just look for another problem to fulfill their prophecy. It's mind boggling that a group who think resolutely in one direction and move as one would call anyone else "sheeple".

    So true. Bizarre that they can't see it.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • joguest
    joguest Posts: 233 Forumite
    julieq - educate yourself (and that goes for anyone else on here that thinks house prices can magically stay as inflated as they are) by typing into google 'The unemployment figures mean carnage for the property market ' to find the moneyweek article - sorry can't link to it directly from here.

    I'm not a bitter potential FTB. I own a house outright and have a second house with 50% equity. When prices are down 40% from peak I'll buy myself a bigger house to live in :D
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 5 September 2009 at 7:16PM
    joguest wrote: »
    julieq - educate yourself (and that goes for anyone else on here that thinks house prices can magically stay as inflated as they are) by typing into google 'The unemployment figures mean carnage for the property market ' to find the moneyweek article - sorry can't link to it directly from here.

    I'm not a bitter potential FTB. I own a house outright and have a second house with 50% equity. When prices are down 40% from peak I'll buy myself a bigger house to live in :D

    Moneyweek :rotfl:
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • bluey890
    bluey890 Posts: 1,020 Forumite
    joguest wrote: »
    julieq - educate yourself (and that goes for anyone else on here that thinks house prices can magically stay as inflated as they are) by typing into google 'The unemployment figures mean carnage for the property market ' to find the moneyweek article - sorry can't link to it directly from here.

    I'm not a bitter potential FTB. I own a house outright and have a second house with 50% equity. When prices are down 40% from peak I'll buy myself a bigger house to live in :D

    US housing: it's not a bubble
    Moneyweek, December 2005

    http://www.moneyweek.com/investments/property/us-housing-its-not-a-bubble.aspx
    Favourite hobbies: Watersports. Relaxing in Coffee Shop. Investing in stocks.
    Personality type: Compassionate Male Armadillo. Sockies: None.
  • wageslave
    wageslave Posts: 2,638 Forumite
    Julie, I always read your posts and generally thank them on the premise that anyone who has put in that amount of effort deserves the kudos. Thanks should never be confused with agreement though, I have even started thanking Hamish.
    julieq wrote: »
    The correction in house prices was long predicted, but the consensus was for a period of stagnation.
    You use the word correction so we will go forward on the basis that we both agree house prices were vastly overinflated.
    julieq wrote: »
    The near collapse of the world banking system wasn't really anticipated, but even with that and the tightest credit since 1982 prices are rising stronglynow.
    Credit is not tight, it has returned to normal levels.
    You talk further down about historical anomalies, 125 percent LTV and interest only mortages with no vehicle for capital repayment, those were historical anomalies.
    julieq wrote: »
    prices are rising stronglynow.
    Strongly?
    julieq wrote: »
    People do not generally buy houses with loans alone, they buy houses with loans based on income and with equity and savings
    Well they do now
    julieq wrote: »
    ..... and first time buyers do not buy average houses.
    Prices are set at the margin. I know that because Generali said so and it made sense. If first time buyers cant get on the housing ladder the most important rung is missing and no one is going anywhere.
    julieq wrote: »
    There's no reason why there should be a link between average earnings and average prices. It's a complete non-sequitur.
    Average people earn average amounts and buy average houses. I cant see how that is affirming the consequent but I am open to the arguement.
    julieq wrote: »
    I'm a bit sick of people saying the "bulls" wish people to be locked out of the market. It's rubbish.
    Couldn't agree more
    julieq wrote: »
    What we do is to explain why what is happening is happening and that a further big correction is wishful thinking based on faulty logic - if you understand why things are happening you have a far better chance of making optimum decisions.
    You are not talking about logic, you are talking about opinion.
    I think it, I am always right, therefore my opinion is logical. That's a thingymajig, I forget the word. Non-sequitur.
    julieq wrote: »
    Yes, it would be nice if we could all have nice houses, but unfortunately everyone is in competition with other people with differing priorities and motivation, and what "should" be the case won't necessarily happen. Everyone here should look at game theory, it's fascinating and explains a lot of what we're seeing.
    I will look up game theory. I enjoy new ideas.
    julieq wrote: »
    To put it another way, I'm "locked out" of the market for chemical factories. People who can afford to invest in chemical factories buy them, often on the basis of loans, and sell me the products in one form or another. It's not bad that I'm locked out of buying factories, it's just how it is. Their income bearing potential implies a higher capital value than I can raise.
    We did actually get it the first time.
    julieq wrote: »
    So it is with housing, people who can afford them will buy them either to live in or to rent out to people who can't at a profit over the lifetime of the investment. That has been the case throughout history, it's a historical anomaly that we have high percentage home ownership here.
    There's no reason for rents to shoot up, but they're not exactly low, are they? Yields are phenomenal in any case, and rents have held up at a time when just about anyone with a variable rate mortgage has seen their outgoings reduce 8 fold or more.
    Your idea of phenomenal might not be the same as mine. It is an emotive word for something that is purely subjective. For professional landlords yields are fairly good for those who saw a second house as a pension vehicle, the road is a little bumpier.
    julieq wrote: »
    Interest rates will rise as fast as the state of the economy permits. You certainly can't extrapolate from the ERM crisis coming of the back of a massively overheating economy and stonking wage inflation, which was the back drop to high interest rates to the currently very depressed conditions. We wouldn't see anything similar without a similar backdrop, and there are very few inflationary pressures inside theUK economy, if anything deflation is a more present threat. And there is no reason why the BOE would attempt to control external price inflation (imported goods and oil) with higher interest rates because they wouldn't have any effect, in fact they'd make a dodgy situation far worse
    Agreed. Sort of.
    julieq wrote: »
    As for the rest, put numbers on things please, otherwise you're just perpetuating myths. It's received wisdom that there was massive fraud in self certified loans, but there's no real evidence for that. Even the Northern Rock mortgage book is ticking over. We are simply not seeing massive defaults.
    Too much googling, someone else can do it. You can do anything with statistics and graphs, even I know that.
    julieq wrote: »
    What I really object to is not the arguments from the bear side - they're entitled to their opinions - but the abject contempt in which they hold anyone with differing views and their mob mentality.
    You're just perpetuating another myth. Shame on you.
    Seriously sometimes people go to far on here, on both sides of the arguement.
    julieq wrote: »
    Anyone who had predicted EXACTLY what has happened since 2007 in 2007 would have been shouted down and mocked as a fool. On the other hand they have got just about everything wrong, from the idea of Zimbabwe style hyperinflation from QE, oil price inflation, the scale of the house price crash, the rise this year (longest Spring EVER!), the resilience of rental income, the lack of BTL bankruptcies in any significant numbers, etc, etc. In the face of being so utterly and completely wrong, most people would ask themselves if they may have been mistaken, but in fact what happens is that they just look for another problem to fulfill their prophecy. It's mind boggling that a group who think resolutely in one direction and move as one would call anyone else "sheeple".
    I am bored now. I have the attention span of a goldfish TBH. I reserve the right to come back and debate this bit later;). Well, if Ad doesn't do it first (and better).
    Retail is the only therapy that works
  • joguest wrote: »
    julieq - educate yourself

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    We really need a better class of bear.

    I can think of two, or possibly three, hpc-ers that might give julieq a run for her money, but you are most certainly not one of them.

    Your retort above, urging one of the most erudite posters out there to "educate" themselves by reading moneyweek, of all things, is laughable.

    You truly have scored nil pois.....
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • joguest
    joguest Posts: 233 Forumite
    Prices are set at the margin. I know that because Generali said so and it made sense. If first time buyers cant get on the housing ladder the most important rung is missing and no one is going anywhere.

    Exactly - well put.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 5 September 2009 at 7:41PM
    joguest wrote: »
    Exactly - well put.

    If prices were set at the margins, then all the reposessions and auction properties selling this year at 40% off peak would have dragged prices down.

    Instead prices have risen every month since february.

    That meme has crashed and burned along with so many others. Try again.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    joguest wrote: »
    Exactly - well put.

    income multiples also fell, with first-timers typically borrowing 3.24 times their salary to fund a purchase, compared with 3.33 in June and a peak of 3.39 in July last year.

    Doesn't seem onerous, just waiting for the deposits now (into at least the third year of saving.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • wageslave
    wageslave Posts: 2,638 Forumite
    We really need a better class of bear.
    Your retort above, urging one of the most erudite posters out there to "educate" themselves
    Hamish, you are luring me to the dark side. I couldn't agree more.
    Retail is the only therapy that works
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.