📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Engagement Rings (merged)

Options
17879818384120

Comments

  • They are very nice, very modern. But very designer in price. I'm sure you could get one made somewhere else cheaper though.

    I have a quote in front of me (random card on desk that wasn't thrown away) for a MQ cut 0.27c for £2795, the matching band was £1195.
  • Starwinky
    Starwinky Posts: 40 Forumite
    Kavanne wrote: »
    What reason did they give for not wanting to do it with your diamond? I am interested as I have a few loose ones I'll want set eventually!

    They didn't give a reason but I'm assuming it's because they can't make enough profit if you supply your own diamond!! Maybe I'm just being cynical? Quotes we have had to have a ring made using our own stone are the same price as buying a ring with a diamond in!!
  • stumpjumper
    stumpjumper Posts: 457 Forumite
    well, one of the reasons is the jewellers insurance.

    Diamonds can break when they are being set - due to the internal flaws, or a stray wack with the hammer when setting the prongs. Now with some jewellers their insurance wont cover a stone that they havent sold, with others, it may well be that there is no money in it for them - some jewellers dont have their own workshop, and use an outside person who does their work for them, as well as the work from other shops.
    in other cases there will be jewellers who only make jewellery, and may sell diamonds as a small part of their business
    2009 wins: Signed Saxon CD, Solar Torch, Drumsticks, Priest Feast Tix, Watch, Hammerfest tix :beer:
  • HI everyone, long time lurker, first time poster here. Firstly, thanks for all the great advice in this thread - I read through pretty much all 41 pages before popping down to Hatton Gardens today for a first look around (planning to pop the question in a few weeks). Anway, I found that A&S in particular grabbed my eye, and I found the following that I really liked:

    Date of Issue: March 16, 2009
    Laser Inscription Registry: GIA 2101582386
    Square Modified Brilliant
    Measurements: 4.19 x 3.99 x 3.38 mm

    Carat Weight: 0.46 carat
    Color Grade: E
    Clarity Grade: VS2

    Proportions:
    Depth: 84.7%
    Table: 66%
    Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
    Culet: None

    Finish:
    Polish: Very Good
    Symmetry: Good
    Fluorescence: None

    Clarity Characteristics:
    Feather

    This was in a really nice platinum ring, and he was offering it to me for approx £1250 (window price was £1500 but they had a '15% sale on'). Can anyone advise me if this is a good deal or not? I really liked the ring, and it sparkled like a disco ball (even away from the bright lights), but my concern based on previous posts is the depth, which looks a bit on the high side.

    Thanks
  • kwaichi
    kwaichi Posts: 161 Forumite
    EastEndStu wrote: »
    HI everyone, long time lurker, first time poster here. Firstly, thanks for all the great advice in this thread - I read through pretty much all 41 pages before popping down to Hatton Gardens today for a first look around (planning to pop the question in a few weeks). Anway, I found that A&S in particular grabbed my eye, and I found the following that I really liked:

    Date of Issue: March 16, 2009
    Laser Inscription Registry: GIA 2101582386
    Square Modified Brilliant
    Measurements: 4.19 x 3.99 x 3.38 mm

    Carat Weight: 0.46 carat
    Color Grade: E
    Clarity Grade: VS2

    Proportions:
    Depth: 84.7%
    Table: 66%
    Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
    Culet: None

    Finish:
    Polish: Very Good
    Symmetry: Good
    Fluorescence: None

    Clarity Characteristics:
    Feather

    This was in a really nice platinum ring, and he was offering it to me for approx £1250 (window price was £1500 but they had a '15% sale on'). Can anyone advise me if this is a good deal or not? I really liked the ring, and it sparkled like a disco ball (even away from the bright lights), but my concern based on previous posts is the depth, which looks a bit on the high side.

    Thanks

    I don't think that is a good price. The most important factors of any diamond are the weight and cut. Although you have a good colour and no visible inclusions the cut will not show those factors off as well as a very good symmetry. If possible find the 2 next to each other and see the difference in fire and sparkle.

    At the end of the day, if you like it you like it. If your gut says yes then there's no reason not to go for it. ;)
    Kwai Chi
    Professional Video blogger
  • Kwaichi, thanks for your reply. I’m a bit surprised as this particular diamond really stood out from the other 3 or 4 I looked at (admittedly I don’t know what their symmetries were) for the amount of fire and sparkle it had. Would moving from Good to Very Good make that much of a difference? Do you think it was a few hundred quid overpriced – the price I mentioned included the 15% discount but can probably be haggled down a bit more - or would you totally avoid it? I agree with what you said about following my gut, but I do have time on my side and work quite close to Hatton Gardens, so I can afford to be picky. :)

    Thanks again
  • LyndsE
    LyndsE Posts: 7 Forumite
    Hi EastEndStu,
    My husband found my engagement ring online, then went down to Hatton Garden to view the diamond and choose the setting. Have a look at qualitydiamonds.co.uk - they have a really good search facilty and they have a 0.46 E VS2 for £645 - the settings are extra, but not too much (from what I remember!)

    Good Luck!:D


    EastEndStu wrote: »
    HI everyone, long time lurker, first time poster here. Firstly, thanks for all the great advice in this thread - I read through pretty much all 41 pages before popping down to Hatton Gardens today for a first look around (planning to pop the question in a few weeks). Anway, I found that A&S in particular grabbed my eye, and I found the following that I really liked:

    Date of Issue: March 16, 2009
    Laser Inscription Registry: GIA 2101582386
    Square Modified Brilliant
    Measurements: 4.19 x 3.99 x 3.38 mm

    Carat Weight: 0.46 carat
    Color Grade: E
    Clarity Grade: VS2

    Proportions:
    Depth: 84.7%
    Table: 66%
    Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
    Culet: None

    Finish:
    Polish: Very Good
    Symmetry: Good
    Fluorescence: None

    Clarity Characteristics:
    Feather

    This was in a really nice platinum ring, and he was offering it to me for approx £1250 (window price was £1500 but they had a '15% sale on'). Can anyone advise me if this is a good deal or not? I really liked the ring, and it sparkled like a disco ball (even away from the bright lights), but my concern based on previous posts is the depth, which looks a bit on the high side.

    Thanks
  • kwaichi
    kwaichi Posts: 161 Forumite
    EastEndStu wrote: »
    Kwaichi, thanks for your reply. I’m a bit surprised as this particular diamond really stood out from the other 3 or 4 I looked at (admittedly I don’t know what their symmetries were) for the amount of fire and sparkle it had. Would moving from Good to Very Good make that much of a difference? Do you think it was a few hundred quid overpriced – the price I mentioned included the 15% discount but can probably be haggled down a bit more - or would you totally avoid it? I agree with what you said about following my gut, but I do have time on my side and work quite close to Hatton Gardens, so I can afford to be picky. :)

    Thanks again

    I had one diamond form a previous engagement and the new one we got recently. My old one was .6 good symmetry, very good polish, colour j, I1. Looking at that compared to our new excellent symmetry ring it makes a massive difference imo. The other factors do make a difference when the diamonds are side by side and the inclusions in the old diamond will make a difference in how much sparkle there is but I don't think it would make as much a difference as the cut. Whereas you have to have a pretty good eye to see the colour and inclusions, the sparkle and fire can be seen by anyone. It's like walking down a shopping mall isle and you see a fleeting light pop up from nowhere in the corner of your eye compared to actually looking for the ring and seeing the sparkle.

    I think if you are unsure then go and just look at loads of loose diamonds and get really familiar with them. Then look at loads of diamonds in settings. The more you look at them the more you will see the differences. Then let your gut do the choosing :)
    Kwai Chi
    Professional Video blogger
  • stumpjumper
    stumpjumper Posts: 457 Forumite
    if it was me, i would be going for a princess that had been graded by the AGS lab for it cut.

    something along the lines of: this 0.52 G VVS2
    DI40X_AGS-7819910.jpg

    maybe with the ring in platium: here
    gi_ST4PPRPT_f.jpg

    Top scorer in cut quality and would be, after importation taxes & postage about £1650 or so, maybe a bit less. And i would lay money that you could tell the visual differance in the cut to the one you saw in Hatton Gardens. (i'm
    2009 wins: Signed Saxon CD, Solar Torch, Drumsticks, Priest Feast Tix, Watch, Hammerfest tix :beer:
  • sandford6016
    sandford6016 Posts: 162 Forumite
    Someone may have recommended them before. But I can't enough for how good www.diamondmanufacturers.co.uk were. They are based in covent garden in london. I designed my own online and had it within a week with all the certificates etc. However, I got the size slightly wrong, they resized it for free!
    :T If you don't have anything sensible to say, don't say it! :T
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.