Accident in store

tbw

love_my_2_boys wrote: »

nah, course you dont but in.
what a load of boll0cks

Crudity clearly becomes you.

juliescot

love_my_2_boys wrote: »

nah, course you dont but in.
what a load of boll0cks

What a shame.

Reasoned debate seems beyond you.

juliescot

love_my_2_boys wrote: »

lol, you think a lot of yourself :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:


Nah I am actually as blunt in real life!!
hang around you neverknow I might have something nice to say to the next shoplifter :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

I have missed something obviously.

Was there a shoplifter post on this thread?

tbw

juliescot wrote: »

I have missed something obviously.

Was there a shoplifter post on this thread?

You're wasting your time Julie - she clearly lives in a twisted little world of her own and doesn't always know what she's talking about !

tandraig

love 2 my boys seems to spend a lot of time on here NOT helping people - i see a pattern here and to be honest a couple of times i have considered pressing the abuse button
but - as I am a newbie - I havent
be warned love 2 my boys - i am watching you as I havent seen ONE positive post from you
oh and juliescot - youre just as bad your more interested in arguing than helping
its no wonder the OP is nowhere to be seen

juliescot

tandraig wrote: »

love 2 my boys seems to spend a lot of time on here NOT helping people - i see a pattern here and to be honest a couple of times i have considered pressing the abuse button
but - as I am a newbie - I havent
be warned love 2 my boys - i am watching you as I havent seen ONE positive post from you
oh and juliescot - youre just as bad your more interested in arguing than helping
its no wonder the OP is nowhere to be seen

I do enjoy a healthy debate it is true.
Not sure why you think correcting misconceptions is wrong.

juliescot

tbw wrote: »

You're wasting your time Julie - she clearly lives in a twisted little world of her own and doesn't always know what she's talking about !

I fear you are correct.

I hope the OP is okay and the supermarket involved has sorted out its procedures.

hundredk

peachyprice wrote: »

And common sense says OP shouldn't have have moved something that would cause a huge mirror to dislodge, she should have told the shop staff to move the mirror before grabbing whatever caused it to move, if she had any sense at all.

She has as much respobsibility for her own actions as the shop does to make sure the shop is safe. If the mirror had been placed on a shelf and was concealed from OP until she removed something from the shelf it would have been a completely different scenario.

It is fair to assume the OP did not realise that moving the object would cause the mirror to fall and this was not a wilful act to cause injury to self.

Common sense says you do not go shopping and expect to have to negotiate precariously placed 7x3 mirrors. It is perfectly reasonable for the customer to expect a large, presumably heavy and dangerous item (and a 7x3 mirror is if it falls on you) to be stacked safely.

The onus is entirely on the store to ensure the environment is safe, not for the customer to assess. Judging by the reactions of staff they recognised this and were trying to find who left it there in error.

hundredk

Blacksheep1979 wrote: »

I'm fairly sure that the op is not blind -

That's an assumption which is probably correct. In which case are you saying blind people should not go into supermarkets because they cannot see precariously placed hazards?

Blacksheep1979 wrote: »

so unless they have a sub average IQ they must understand that if two things are touching each other if you move one then there is a good chance the other will move. I'm also guessing that she may understand that big heavy things hurt when they fall on you, if not before then she does now...

What IQ do you suggest you need to safely enter the store?

hundredk

love_my_2_boys wrote: »

Nah not really, I couldn't give a toss to be honest

:rotfl::rotfl:

Fair point, you must get used to it after a while.