We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
£3 (approx) cream tops the anti-ageing charts
Comments
-
I was going to ask that too - and do the expensive eye creams have an SPF factor? There's more to anti-ageing than visible improvement in the short term, it's the long-term sun damage that most people buying these products are hoping to avoid.
I was talking to staff in Boots about this recently, they were horrified that I just use baby lotion on my face, and no SPF - no wonder I'm getting wrinkles
The survey recommended that:
To avoid lines around the eyes, don’t smoke and wear UV-absorbing sunglasses. Dr Griffiths says: ‘The best prevention is an adequate sunscreen or cream containing one'.
The scope of this particular study was to observe wrinkle improvement.
Studying the best SPF-containing eye creams would necessitate an entirely different study, involving varying degrees of exposure to UV rays, etc.
[Edit to add]:
Discussion of the sun and its effects are outwith my remit. Please remember that I'm based in Scotland. There does seem to be some kind of an invisible shield that won't let the Sun rays through - I think it's called rain!!! Definitely has a deflecting ability - lol. The rain buddies up with dark clouds, hence the reason why we remain peely-wally (pale) and have delayed-onset wrinkles - lol.Invented tradition: Couponology
Fancy title: Couponologist
Motto: Because I have conviction doesn't mean I'm a convict
.0 -
So they didn't test any natural products. They are all standard high street pots of chemicals. They could have at least added a plain oil like olive or jojoba and see how that compared.0
-
so who paid for the research? Simple by any chance? Which? are not as impartial as they like us to believe! It was certainly not made clear in all reporting that the report related to eye creams only - it was very ambiguous. So at the end of the day it seems the same advice applies - you decide what suits you and what price you are willing to pay.0
-
About the Which? article:
For further information, the full article, images or an interview, please contact Nicole Gross on [EMAIL="nicole.gross@which.co.uk"]nicole.gross@which.co.uk[/EMAIL] or 0207 770 7564.
Please free to pass your concerns to Ms Gross.
About Which? in general:
"Which? does more than just test washing machines. We campaign to get a fairer deal for all consumers and publish expert, unbiased information to help you make the right choice, whatever you're buying."
If anyone has any concrete evidence to the contrary, please feel free to post here. If they don't have evidence to the contrary, then please resist posting comments...quite 'simple'.Invented tradition: Couponology
Fancy title: Couponologist
Motto: Because I have conviction doesn't mean I'm a convict
.0 -
What a load of rubbish! The Consumers' Association (i.e. Which?) publish the Good Food Guide, amongst various other things. One of the frustrating things for the Good Food Guide team is that the rules to ensure that their products cannot in any way be interpreted as having accepted advertising are SO STRICT that there are all sorts of things that they cannot do to promote themselves. One example was that a few years back Renault wanted to give away a free copy of the Good Food Guide with each car, it was referrred to the appropriate committee upstairs and they decided that it was "too close to forming a commercial relationship", so they wouldn't permit it to happen. :rotfl:so who paid for the research? Simple by any chance? Which? are not as impartial as they like us to believe! It was certainly not made clear in all reporting that the report related to eye creams only - it was very ambiguous. So at the end of the day it seems the same advice applies - you decide what suits you and what price you are willing to pay.Thanks to all who post constructively.
Have an A1 day!0 -
LittleMissAspie wrote: »So they didn't test any natural products. They are all standard high street pots of chemicals. They could have at least added a plain oil like olive or jojoba and see how that compared.
I thought that as there are some fab natural/chemical free/lower chemical free products about too in addition to natural oils. I do use the Simple face wipes - another good thing about the Simple range is that it is cruelty free:D Ive never been tempted by the more expensive creams/a lot of the high street ones like Boots due to their animal testing policies. Simple and even Superdrug now with a lot of their own brand ranges are cruelty free which is great.Sealed Pot Challenge number 8 Amount declared £365.50.
Sealed pot challenge number 9 number 4820 -
All simple range - 3 for 2 on Boots :jDEBT FREE since 2011
Retiring to Spain has changed my world
:beer:0 -
Simple range (including this cream and face wipes are £2.91 each in tesco's or 3 for £5.0
-
Been using the Simple Cream for a few days now.It feels very watery and not very nice on my face.Not for me.
.......
Back to Decleor, Im afraid........more fool me
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: I appreciate Each and Every win. I thank every comp poster from the bottom of my heart :A0 -
Does anyone know the best place to buy the simple eye cream ? Is it on offer at tesco and superdrug too ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards