credit reference ...the quickest way ideally...

never-in-doubt

UK0106 wrote: »

Where in my post did I say you post junk? I simply said that high post counts do not automatically mean you know what you're talking about. Just because you don't agree with the things I'm saying, it doesn't mean that I don't know what I'm talking about.

I don't not agree with you, I totally disagree with you and have even went in editing quotes you've given people in the past as you talk rubbish! One that springs to mind 'the 3 cra's are independant and experian cannot give feeds to callCredit' ermmm, yes they can and ermmm, yes they did and ermmm, they still do it even today!

You came here and attacked my post, which was and is clearly factual and I do ask you to substantiate your claim of difference otherwise we can all sit here and say something, without proof there is nothing!

UK0106 wrote: »

If boasting about helping people to wriggle out of paying their debts makes you feel good about yourself, go for it!

Boasting? nah, it's actually called being helpful, unlike you by all accounts.

UK0106 wrote: »

I don't have to prove anything to you, nor do I want to see your credit reports. My Callcredit report was the only one searched when I applied for a specific card which is proof enough to me that certain organisations use them for searching and I know you're wrong. I don't care whether you want to admit that you're wrong or not.

You are laying claim so prove it or the claim is dead! Which card exactly, please confirm....?

UK0106 wrote: »

If you had read my post properly, I actually said I know people who work for Callcredit - I couldn't think of anything worse that working in that sort of place dealing with knobs like you all day. Have you never heard that when you assume, you make an !!! out of you although you evidently don't need much encouragement to do that. User is Now Ignored? That's mature - guess you don't like people disagreeing with you?

You're not disagreeing with me, you're attacking a perfectly credible post with utter nonsense and yea, I defend my position..... that is about that :rotfl:

PNPSUKNET

its ok ignore never-in-doubt he has a complex problem, I use the ignore button

never-in-doubt

PNPSUKNET wrote: »

its ok ignore never-in-doubt he has a complex problem, I use the ignore button

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

duggie1982

It looks like people like attacking Never In Doubt for no real reason.

He was just helping out a MSE'r and got jumped for it.

Some people need to grow up and try giving good advice for a change instead of trying to pick fights on a forum

UK0106

never-in-doubt wrote: »

I don't not agree with you, I totally disagree with you and have even went in editing quotes you've given people in the past as you talk rubbish! One that springs to mind 'the 3 cra's are independant and experian cannot give feeds to callCredit' ermmm, yes they can and ermmm, yes they did and ermmm, they still do it even today!

You came here and attacked my post, which was and is clearly factual and I do ask you to substantiate your claim of difference otherwise we can all sit here and say something, without proof there is nothing!



Boasting? nah, it's actually called being helpful, unlike you by all accounts.



You are laying claim so prove it or the claim is dead! Which card exactly, please confirm....?



You're not disagreeing with me, you're attacking a perfectly credible post with utter nonsense and yea, I defend my position..... that is about that :rotfl:

Thought I was now being ignored?!

I totally disagree with you too. Experian do NOT feed credit report data to Callcredit. Data is supplied by 3rd party organisations to each CRA individually which is the exact reason why the information held on reports with the differents CRAs can differ. If a 3rd party supplies an update about an account to Equifax and not Experian, the information about that account will not be the same on the reports of both CRAs. You saying that I'm talking rubbish will not make the fact any less true.

Once again, I don't have to prove anything to you. Who I apply for credit facilities with is my personal business & I'm under no obligation to share that information with you or anybody else. I know you're wrong and that's good enough for me - unlike you, I don't feel the need to have the whole forum believe that a post is wrong.

You're the one who keeps banging on about proving stuff; why don't you prove your claims? Prove that Experian do feed data to Callcredit. Prove that no other UK credit organisation use Callcredit to carry out searches? Maybe when you're willing and able to do that, other members may be more amenable to your demands for proof.

You defend your position, I defend mine. Abusing me is not going to make me lay down and say "oh, never-in-doubt, I bow to your wisdom. Obviously you know everything about everything and cannot be wrong!".

Let's just agree to disagree shall we?

UK0106

duggie1982 wrote: »

It looks like people like attacking Never In Doubt for no real reason.

He was just helping out a MSE'r and got jumped for it.

Some people need to grow up and try giving good advice for a change instead of trying to pick fights on a forum

Maybe if the information being supplied to other users was correct, there'd be no need for people to be "attacking" NID.

Just so you know, a forum is an exchange of personal OPINION and INFORMATION. My OPINION is that the INFORMATION being supplied by said poster is incorrect & I am, therefore, well within my rights to say so.

Are you some sort of self-appointed moderator?

duggie1982

UK0106 wrote: »

Maybe if the information being supplied to other users was correct, there'd be no need for people to be "attacking" NID.

Just so you know, a forum is an exchange of personal OPINION and INFORMATION. My OPINION is that the INFORMATION being supplied by said poster is incorrect & I am, therefore, well within my rights to say so.

Are you some sort of self-appointed moderator?

No Im not a 'self appointed moderator' And fair enough if you are saying NID's info is incorrect then why dont you provide the information that says he is incorrect? Credit card that only uses CallCredit? Why not give that information then? There is no point giving your opinion if you are only going to give some information is there?

never-in-doubt

duggie1982 wrote: »

No Im not a 'self appointed moderator' And fair enough if you are saying NID's info is incorrect then why dont you provide the information that says he is incorrect? Credit card that only uses CallCredit? Why not give that information then? There is no point giving your opinion if you are only going to give some information is there?

Duggie, waste of time mate these are all part of the last lot (allthingsconsidered etc) they sit on the forum for a month or so then make a beeline for me, it doesn't matter cos I get used to it and as I say, my proof is throughout the forum which more than covers my knowledge on CRA's - as you say, he won;t tell us the name of the credit card cos he knows i'll be straight back with a post dispelling his theory.

Waste of time. :beer:

UK0106

duggie1982 wrote: »

No Im not a 'self appointed moderator' And fair enough if you are saying NID's info is incorrect then why dont you provide the information that says he is incorrect? Credit card that only uses CallCredit? Why not give that information then? There is no point giving your opinion if you are only going to give some information is there?

Why not? There's no rule to posting that says you have to give all of the information you know in order to state your opinion.

Funny how it's acceptable to you for NID to tell people they're wrong and don't know what they're talking about without ever proving it.

never-in-doubt

UK0106 wrote: »

Why not? There's no rule to posting that says you have to give all of the information you know in order to state your opinion.

Funny how it's acceptable to you for NID to tell people they're wrong and don't know what they're talking about without ever proving it.

What are you on about here? You said you can name a card that explicitly uses CallCredit and I said this is Monument, you said it was not so then TELL US THE NAME?

Without backing up claims then of course you'll get called out and you cannot name the other card that is why you're proving you're causing trouble - nothing else. My point is and remains factual.