We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Car and wife hit by another car!

1789101113»

Comments

  • flea72
    flea72 Posts: 5,392 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You must admit there is a far far greater chance of being hit whilst spending minutes with you rear end waving about in traffic oblivious to whats happening around you than there is from doing the same from the safe side? :confused:

    Also being a bit pedantic here, in the case you offer above, you would go through the rear window and not the windsceen, but you wouldn't as the front and rear head rests would offer protection;). Anyway thats nit picking, the 1st points the important one, keep it safe,;)

    well ive been putting kids into my car with my backside in the road, for over 15yrs now, and have never been hit

    however my car has been rear-ended twice whilst parked in the same spot

    If a driver is oblivious to whats going on around them, then its always their fault if an accident occurs

    Front and rear headrests offer no protection, spose you havent seen the adverts, where the rear passengers crush those in the front? and a small child, could just sail over the top (seeing as a child restraint raises them up above normal seat height)

    What im saying is, its no safer to get into a car, without strapping your kids in first, espec if there are drivers around not paying attention

    most people would assume that another road user, would be able to see an already open car door - and im sure watching out for people opening car doors where there is a row of parked cars, is something that is brought up as part of your driving test/instruction - i know i had to give a running commentary as i drove, about what dangers i could see, and what appropriate action i was taking

    Flea
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    flea72 wrote: »
    well ive been putting kids into my car with my backside in the road, for over 15yrs now, and have never been hit
    Maybe you have a smaller than average backside;);)

    however my car has been rear-ended twice whilst parked in the same spot
    Maybe it's because the car spends alot more time parked than actually being loaded? Or maybe the other driver aimed to mis your rear end? It also goes to indicate how hazardous conditions can be during the school run?

    If a driver is oblivious to whats going on around them, then its always their fault if an accident occurs
    Exactly, when you are bent over loading the kids into the car how can you be anything but oblivious to whats happening in front or behind your car ?

    Front and rear headrests offer no protection, spose you havent seen the adverts, where the rear passengers crush those in the front? and a small child, could just sail over the top (seeing as a child restraint raises them up above normal seat height)
    Of course I've seen the adverts, they're very thought provoking. But the car in question there is moving forewards. The whole point seems lost on you. When you are stationary and get hit from the rear, effectively you go backwards not forwards, it's due to your inertia

    What im saying is, its no safer to get into a car, without strapping your kids in first, espec if there are drivers around not paying attention
    Rubbish, just ask yourself which side of the car is the safest to load from?
    and the fact that there may, infact are, drivers around not paying attention is the reason for doing it correctly:wall::wall:

    most people would assume that another road user, would be able to see an already open car door - and im sure watching out for people opening car doors where there is a row of parked cars, is something that is brought up as part of your driving test/instruction - i know i had to give a running commentary as i drove, about what dangers i could see, and what appropriate action i was taking
    They also teach you never to assume anything and to drive defensively, difficult as that may seem to understand it also applies any time you are on the road, even walking/loading.

    Flea



    Quoting things like "I've been doing it this way for 15 years and never had a problem" is a bit like a 100/day smoker saying "Never did me any harm" :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
  • terryya
    terryya Posts: 603 Forumite
    I wasn't trying to apportion blame, just say how I managed to strap two kids into a five door car without sticking my arris in the road!

    On a slightly different note, one time when driving in the dark there was a car parked on the side of oncoming traffic with his headlights on. Because of this I'd already slowed down which is a good job as the door into the road was wide open but because of the lights invisible until you were literally on top of it!

    I know it won't have been dark during the school run when the OP posted but something to think about.
  • flea72
    flea72 Posts: 5,392 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Quoting things like "I've been doing it this way for 15 years and never had a problem" is a bit like a 100/day smoker saying "Never did me any harm" :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    and the fact youve never been hit, whilst strapping your kids in, from inside the car, could be viewed in the same way :rolleyes:

    Flea
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    flea72 wrote: »
    and the fact youve never been hit, whilst strapping your kids in, from inside the car, could be viewed in the same way :rolleyes:

    Flea

    Standing on the pavement I couldnt could I? :confused::confused::confused:

    I'll ask you again, which way do you think is safest?

    And because you seem to be having so much trouble with this, I'll give you a few clues;

    Are you more likely to be hit when loading from the road?

    Are your kids more lik...............................................?

    Is your car more likely to be hit..................................?

    Is someone else likely to damage their car when l..........?

    Are you creating an unneccessary hazard by loading......?


    It's a no brainer, but thats an issue for some folks
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.