We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Halifax down 0.5% MoM, 15% YoY
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Whats the not seasonally adjusted figure.....:p
unless you can explain why we should, forget the seasonally adjusted - it's down month on month 0.5%
May = £158,541
June = £157,7130 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »So how they figure out that a drop is now a rise?
Or am I missing something really obvious?!
yes you are missing something - it's a YOY comparison
so if you purchased in February you would have 'made money' on your property.
that's the point of going back to Feb to compare - even though they have dropped the YOY has still 'increased' :rolleyes:0 -
A 0.5% FALL right smack in the middle of the 'spring bounce'. That's MASSIVE. Just think what'll be like in the cold winter months. There must be an awful lot of worried BTL chancers out there.
There's only one word to say:
TIMBER !!!!!!!!!!Krusty & Phil Madoff, 1990 - 2007:
"Buy now because house prices only ever go UP, UP, UP."0 -
yes you are missing something - it's a YOY comparison
so if you purchased in February you would have 'made money' on your property.
that's the point of going back to Feb to compare - even though they have dropped the YOY has still 'increased' :rolleyes:
Er, not it doesn't. It just shows that the yearly drop is decreasing.
Taken from the halifax report.
Index Standardised Monthly Annual Price/
1983=100 Average Price Change Change
£ % %*
Period
Feb 519.1 160,390 -2.3 -17.7
Mar 509.2 157,320 -1.9 -17.5
Apr 500.0 154,490 -1.8 -17.7
May 513.1 158,541 2.6 -16.3
Jun 510.4 157,713 -0.5 -15.00 -
Deleted_User wrote: »Er, not it doesn't. It just shows that the yearly drop is decreasing.
yes you're right got that bit the wrong way around.
should have added "comparing the YOY to last month" at the end of the sentence.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »So how they figure out that a drop is now a rise?
Or am I missing something really obvious?!
Graham,
The -ve in June last year was a bigger -ve than this months -ve.
Because the 2008 figure drops out of the YoY to be replaced by the 2009 one, the effect on the YoY figure, is the difference between the two figures.
i.e. Jun 2008 was -1.8%, this years is -0.5%, a difference of 1.3%. So the YoY has gone from -16.3% to -15%.
If we were to have 12 months of consistent -0.5%, we'd end up at -6%, rising from -15%, but without an actual +ve in any given month.
hth.0 -
Deleted_User wrote: »Er, not it doesn't. It just shows that the yearly drop is decreasing.
Taken from the halifax report.
Index Standardised Monthly Annual Price/
1983=100 Average Price Change Change
£ % %*
Period
Feb 519.1 160,390 -2.3 -17.7
Mar 509.2 157,320 -1.9 -17.5
Apr 500.0 154,490 -1.8 -17.7
May 513.1 158,541 2.6 -16.3
Jun 510.4 157,713 -0.5 -15.0
Its the trend here that is important. Look at that sequence -which is the erroneuos figure.0 -
unless you can explain why we should, forget the seasonally adjusted - it's down month on month 0.5%
I think there are bigger factors at play than just seasonality, so the SA figures distort rather than help at the moment....
Raw data is more helpful to guage the size of both ups and downs, as nobody actually pays a "seasonally adjusted" price in the market.
If a house would cost you X in May, and you now have to pay X plus Y in June, then it matters not one bit that the seasonally adjusted figure says it's a fall, if it isn't in reality. Likewise next Winter, when prices will surely drop off a bit, the same SA will mask the true size of falls.
SA distorts both gains and falls, and whilst it works well in a normal market, this is far from normal. Best just to see the real prices.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
-
Its the trend here that is important. Look at that sequence -which is the erroneuos figure.
Why not do the fall over the first 6 monthsI did it from Dec price (so we get the full 6 months of the year).
£3148 (falls inc june) / £160861 (dec price) X100 = 1.96%:)
it could be just a 5% fall this year.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards