We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Social Security Fraud Squad
Comments
-
Is it just me, or is the OP actually just visiting a gym, perhaps with a physio/ OT/ trainer? I am intrigued as to what the 'treatment room is a space the public can use when needed, thus, open to the public' is!

Chap I used to work with had a mild heart attack and went to do disco dancing classes on the NHS as part of his rehab. Could be something like that?
But depending on the nature of the disability, gyms can be a very good idea. Marvellous for depression, for eample. Someone thrashing away furiously at a gym would be doing their mental health a lot of favours.:idea:0 -
Thats what I was thinking too. I'm thinking perhaps the OP is worried that they are seen to be 'getting better' their DLA will stop? Difficult line - brings to mind the army Major who had his legs blown off but walked the London Marthon - now would they say because he can walk 26miles he shouldnt get DLA (which is sooooo wrong in my humble).0
-
Is it just me, or is the OP actually just visiting a gym, perhaps with a physio/ OT/ trainer? I am intrigued as to what the 'treatment room is a space the public can use when needed, thus, open to the public' is!

That's exactly what I thought - I couldn't see that it could be anything else!0 -
christiane wrote: »A last attempt:
If I have proof that a member of staff in the clinic has contacted authorities and informed them about my presence in the treatment room, which is public, does this in your opinion constitute a gross breach of privacy law and human rights or not?'
pls only answers to this question!
thanks
No, because any member of the public could have phoned the authorities.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
I was beginning to wonder whether it is a gym, blooming hilarious thread nonetheless!Be happy, it's the greatest wealth
0 -
welshmoneylover wrote: »I was beginning to wonder whether it is a gym, blooming hilarious thread nonetheless!
The tears of laughter are running down my legs.:rotfl::rotfl:make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
and we will never, ever return.0 -
Christiane, I've finally managed to find you on MSE. Sorry I don't have time to read your thread, anyway, when are you running your next aerobics class down at the health centre?0
-
mouseymousey99 wrote: »Thats what I was thinking too. I'm thinking perhaps the OP is worried that they are seen to be 'getting better' their DLA will stop? Difficult line - brings to mind the army Major who had his legs blown off but walked the London Marthon - now would they say because he can walk 26miles he shouldnt get DLA (which is sooooo wrong in my humble).
Yes, you hear of these loopholes. I saw something on the telly recently about a young chap who had survived the Bombay shootings last year but become paralysed and wheelchair bound and (I think cos it happened abroad or something) didn't qualify for anything at all off the state. Disgusting really.:idea:0 -
If it's a public space, then they are not invading your privacy, and are just as entitled to be there as you are. You should be grateful they're checking up on you, as if you have nothing to hide, then they'll report back exactly that.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
The Social Security fraud people have no powers to invade privacy any more than any ordinary member of the public EXCEPT where they have reason to suspect fraud, e.g. a tip-off from a disgruntled ex or other informer (who may be a false witness but holds a grudge). Have you got any enemies?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

